Runner’s diary, Wednesday

Closed a week with a five-mile run in 42:15 and then hit the weights for a bit. That puts me at 13 for the week and 217 for the year so far, eight miles behind where I hoped to be. March was busy and closes with gum surgery and a weekend of no fun. Stocking up on the magazines and books and should be back to normal by Monday.

Music: Arctic Monkeys, My Favourite Worst Nightmare

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Imperfections and the American experiment

I had the chance to interview Chris Hedges, author of “American Fascists” and “I Don’t Believe in Atheists” yesterday on his books and other writings, a discussion that explored the inherent fallibility of humanity and the dangers of assuming our perfectibility. (The interview is for a story for our Time Off magazine that will run in April, in anticipation of Hedges’ appearance at the Princeton Library.)

The notion that we are moving forward, evolving, that there is an inevitable perfection that we are striving t0ward is a dangerous one, a notion that creates divisions, that privileges some at the expense of others. His contention is that the Religious Right and what he calls the New Atheist (radical nonbelievers with an almost messianic believe in science and progress) view the world through this false paradigm of progress.

The rhetorical parallels between Christian fundamentalists like Pat Robertson and atheists like Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens are striking. They see those they disagree with as being stains on the potential perfectibility of the human race that have to be removed. They brook no disagreements, tolerate no difference. All who are different, who disagree contribute to the greater evil and must be opposed, by force if necessary.

“There are lots of parallels between the Christian right and the proto-fascist movements in the former Yugoslavia,” he told me. Hedges spent almost 20 years as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East and the former Yugoslavia.

“They were movements that got their identities through religion,” he continued. “The sanctification of violence, the elevation of a particular group to a higher moral claim, the demonization of other belief systems — the religious right has that in spades, as do the new atheists.”

Both rely on a simplification of belief — Robertson and his ilk reducing religious faith to a set of hard-and-fast rules that eliminate choice and free will, rules that make it easy for he and his followers to claim a false moral high ground; Hitchens and his compadres do the same, substituting science and reason for religion.

That’s why it is no accident that both groups supported the Iraq War, that both groups justify the use of torture and the constriction of rights and liberties.

Faith, however, is more complicated. Faith, as Kierkegaard wrote, demands a greater intellectual commitment than the totalitarian approach of the religious right. It is deeply personal, built on the realization that we are not perfect, that we are connected and that there is something greater out there or within us.

Sin is a part of us, he says; it is at our core. To acknowledge this allows us to understand and empathize with others, to see the common humanity we share.

As Hedges writes in “American Fascists:

God is inscrutable, mysterious and unknowable. We do not understand what life is about, what it means, why we are here and what will happen to us after our brief sojourn on the planet ends. We are saved, in the end, by faith — faith that life is not meaningless and random, that there is a purpose to human existence, and that in the midst of this morally neutral universe the tiny, seemingly insignificant acts of compassion and blind human kindness, especially to those labeled our enemies and strangers, sustain the divine spark, which is love. We are not fully human if we live alone. These small acts of compassion — for they can never be organized and institutionalized as can hate — have a power that lives after us.

It is this understanding that is at the base of our democratic culture, a tolerance and empathy that allows for our imperfectability, that encourages us to lend a hand, to reach out, to become part of a larger community of humanity.

It also is deeply patriotic, a central tenet of the American experiment. James Carroll, the fine Boston Globe columnist, explored this theme Monday in his reaction to Barack Obama’s speech last week on race:

In this nation, that imperfection has been permanently manifest by the racial divide, which gave Obama his subject. The imperfections of racism spawned the responses of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, “as imperfect as he may be.”

But don’t let the imperfections of response outweigh the far graver imperfections of a grotesquely unfair social system. People who benefit from an imperfect power structure speak warmly of love, while those who suffer from it angrily demand justice.

But the deeper question goes to the human condition itself: In our unending quest for a better world, how do we deal with the inevitably flawed character of every society, and of every citizen? How does each of us deal, that is, with the inevitable complicity of our leadership – our preachers, our politicians – in what ails society? How do we deal with our own complicity?

Carroll goes on to echo some of the themes that Hedges explores in his two books:

The ingenious American framers took for granted the universality of human imperfection. The Constitution is a system of checks and balances because every officeholder in government – from president, to judge, to legislator – is assumed to be flawed. Every power center – from state to federal – is capable of abusing power.

Therefore, officeholders are checked by one another, power centers are in balance, and the entire arrangement is accountable to an electorate, whose prerogatives are enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Constitutional democracy, even balancing majority rule with protections for minorities, is the political system that came into being when humans stopped pretending that perfection was possible. The American paradox is that this rejection of utopian ambition is the beginning of authentic political equality.

This equality, protected by our fragile democratic government, is not the culmination of some inevitable political evolution. It is the result of much trial and error, its frailty inherent, permanent (if anything can be permanent, it is frailty and impermanence).

Our responsibility is to do what we can to maintain this fragile arrangement.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

All surged out

I get tired of hearing about the so-called success of the surge. The fact remains that the security gains that the added troops have offered are not enough to justify our continuing presence or to justify retroactively what has been one of the greatest foreign policy errors in the nation’s history.

In any case, to call the surge a success is to downgrade what the surge was supposed to accomplish. The political situation in Iraq remains a mess and the reality is that Iraq is just as likely to continue its violent dissolution whether we are there or not.

But it is beginning to appear that even the small victories — the improved security — were just a small oasis in the much larger desert of disaster. According to the McClatchy newspaper group, the surge maybe unraveling.

A cease-fire critical to the improved security situation in Iraq appeared to unravel Monday when a militia loyal to radical Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada al Sadr began shutting down neighborhoods in west Baghdad and issuing demands of the central government.

Simultaneously, in the strategic southern port city of Basra, where Sadr’s Mahdi militia is in control, the Iraqi government launched a crackdown in the face of warnings by Sadr’s followers that they’ll fight government forces if any Sadrists are detained. By 1 a.m. Arab satellite news channels reported clashes between the Mahdi Army and police in Basra.

The freeze on offensive activity by Sadr’s Mahdi Army has been a major factor behind the recent drop in violence in Iraq, and there were fears that the confrontation that’s erupted in Baghdad and Basra could end the lull in attacks, assassinations, kidnappings and bombings.

Deaths are on the rise, as well.

As Shiite violence rises, U.S. troop deaths also appear to be rising in places such as Baghdad, where the American military is thinning out its presence as part of its drawdown of five brigades. Attacks against civilians in the capital are rising, according to statistics compiled by McClatchy. Next week, the U.S. will finish pulling out the second of five surge brigades. As part of the drawdown, the military has moved battalions out of Baghdad toward more violent areas such as the northern city of Mosul and Iraq’s northeastern Diyala province.

As the troop presence has shifted, so has the violence. For the first time since January, a majority of U.S. troops were killed in Baghdad, not in outlying northern provinces. Indeed, the U.S. military reached the death of its 4,000th soldier in Iraq on Sunday, when four U.S. soldiers were killed in southern Baghdad.

So far, this month, 27 soldiers have been killed in Iraq. Of those, 16, or 59 percent, died in Baghdad. In January, 25 percent of U.S. deaths happened in Baghdad, or 10 of 40.

Civilian casualties in Baghdad are also on the rise, according to a McClatchy count. After a record low through November, when at least 76 people were killed and 306 were injured, the deaths began to rise. In December, it crept up to 88 people killed, in January 100 and in February 172. As of March 24, at least 149 people were killed and 448 were injured.

American military and government officials say removing troops now would be a mistake. But it’s difficult to see why, and given their failures over the last five years — most notably the Bush administration’s decision to wage pre-emptive war in the first place.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

State facing fiscal doom

OK. That headline is a bit strong, but given the straits the state faces annually, the structural deficit it has to plug just to break even, this news is not good.

In a sign that the faltering economy is further pinching state finances, nonpartisan legislative analysts believe state tax receipts over the next 15 months will be $134 million below those projected by the Corzine administration just a month ago.

While the discrepancy is small compared to the governor’s recommended $33 billion budget, some fear it could signal a slump in revenues that could worsen as the year unfolds.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.