Strange logic on James

Bob Braun tries to make the case that Sharpe James’ transgressions — the use of his office to enrich himself and a mistress — constitute a victimless crime and, because of that, he should not have been subject to federal prosecution.

And it’s true that no one in particular was hurt, but the damage that James’ conduct causes to our democracy — a central point of many of the speeches/essays in Bill Moyers’ new book, Moyers on Democracy — means that James’ abuse of his office has an untold number of victims.

Braun acknowledges this:

Cynicism accumulates when an official is convicted, and it more deeply buries chances for reform. Corruption is a self-fulfilling prophecy — there are victims when the good do nothing.

And, yet, he says, “federal prosecutions should be reserved for crimes that do have victims.”

Violent crimes. The plague of guns transported across state lines. Wretched housing from which some — often out-of-staters — garner profits. Violation of labor and product-safety laws. The big business in illicit drug transportation and sale.

Diverting resources from these crimes creates victims. But they aren’t as much fun to read about.

The crimes he lists, of course, deserve federal focus (consider them the criminal version of interstate commerce) but that does not preclude federal prosecution when a public official is found to have misused his office for private gain.

The economy is basically sound — yeah, right

New Jersey is not ground zero for the national foreclosure crisis — and still the foreclosure rate in the Garden State is up 140 percent over the last three months. Congress has acted, passing a bailout bill that will enhance regulation and provide money for lenders and borrowers. The question is whether it will be enough to slow the downward spiral and keep the economy from completely melting down.

Dispatches: It’s a gas, gas, gas

Dispatches — on John McCain’s oil-drilling plan — went up yesterday.

Here is a letter I received today in response — which will run in next week’s paper:

Its a gas (according to the Luddites),
Nice “Dispatches”,
Of course we all are all suffering from high energy prices. While you, and fellow liberals Obama, Kennedy , Nader, etc.. bash John McCain’s sensible solution of off-shore drilling, you neglect to mention the “dirty little secret” that can solve our
energy problems.
You mention wind, solar, biofuels. These are a drop in the bucket. What about safe, efficient , NUCLEAR POWER? The Luddite knee-jerk aversion to a proven, clean, safe alternative energy source could well be our countries undoing.The French, Russians, and now the Chinese have found the answer. It is only our week-kneed liberal politicians that are holding us back for the most efficient, safe, answer to our energy problem.
That you can write a 3 column article decrying our energy policy, and not even mentioning the Nuclear alternative reveals your misguided, left wing , tree-hugging
bias
Ken White
Monmouth Junction

I won’t comment.