Saturday playlist: R.E.M. through the years

R.E.M. issued a remastered version of its 1988 album, Green this week, which got me thinking a bit about who the band was and what it meant to me when it was still recording and touring and what it means to me now.

Green is not my favorite R.E.M. album — hell, it’s not in my top 8 (see below). But it is still a great album in many ways, which proves just how significant the Athens, Ga., quartet was.

First, consider the timing. Green was released just five years after Murmur, making it the culmination of a frenetic period of creativity — six albums in six years. And it was a commercial breakthrough that turned R.E.M. into an arena band without sacrificing any of its indy cred.

Pitchfork offers a great overview and review, so I won’t belabor it, but what’s shocking to me is that Green’s weakness can only be viewed as a weakness within the context of what the band managed to do on its first nine albums. Green, to me, is the weakest of them, which says far more about the perfection of Document and Automatic for the People than it says about Green.

I first heard R.E.M. on WRSU, Rutgers’ student radio station, when this odd, jangly pop song that took its name from the American-funded station broadcasting into the then-Eastern bloc. The sound was different — nothing like the radio pop of the time, but also not punk or new wave. There was a freshness and a DIY quality — the vocals were a bit muffled and buried in the mix. So I bought Murmur — and continued buying their records until they announced last year that they were splitting up.

The impact of those early records is hard to explain, as I said; the lo-fi sound was different than what was dominating the radio. There was a simplicity to the sound and a complexity to the lyrics, which were literate and muffled and mysterious. This was not Haircut 100 or the Flock of Seaguls. It was not Duran Duran, a pretty band with a pretty sound singing about pretty things in a superficial manner. This was serious stuff and, in its odd way, it helped keep alive the emotional and artistic rebellion launched by punk at a time when that rebellion’s fire was dying out.
I saw the band in 1987, on the Document tour on my 25th birthday at the Rutgers Athletic Center. In a couple of years they would be playing arenas while still putting out music that stood in stark contrast to the pompous nonsense that characterized arena rock. By the time Out of Time was released in 1990, Stipe had moved from mumbling to singing, his lyrics growing and shifting with this change.
The band’s artistic growth peaked with Automatic for the People, one of rock music’s most perfect recordings. It was quieter, mournful, but just as forceful and focused as anything they had done. It also represented a bit of an endpoint — everything that comes after Automatic is essentially a search for direction. Monster is the best of what follows, R.E.M.’s answer to Kurt Cobain and its last great disc.
This is not to denigrate what follows, because even Reveal, by far the weakest album in the R.E.M. canon, is a solid bit of pop and far better than what most bands produce at their best. I can say this without hyperbole, having spent the better part of the week listening to the full catalog, 15 studio albums, plus assorted Best of collections and live discs that taken together stand as a testament to the band’s greatness and lasting legacy.
My ranking:

1. Document
2. Automatic for the People
3. Reckoning
4. Chronic Town (EP)
4. Murmur
5. Life’s Rich Pageant
6. Out of Time
7. Fables of the Reconstruction
8. Monster
9. Green
10. Accelerate
11. Around the Sun
12. New Adventures in Hi-Fi
13. Up
14. Collapse into Now
15. Reveal

A god complex

I’m at the car dealership today, getting some basic maintenance done when I overhear a conversation between a woman and an older man.

“I was brought up a Baptist, ” he said. “But I realized I had to find a different church to hear the real Word.”

“It’s so watered down now, from the Founding Fathers,” she said.

“And we don’t have Christian men leading us, when they endorse homosexuality.”

The Founders, of course, were nominally Christian — they were deists who believed in a creator and were careful to exclude overt mention of god in our founding documents. They were skeptics who understood the dangers of mixing politics with religion because they lived through the violence and intolerance that mixture breeds.

And yet, there’s nothing unusual or ahistorical about this overheard conversation. Since our beginnings as a nation, there have been men — and women — who have wanted to impose their conception of god on their neighbors and who have attempted to claim the Founders as religious zealots like themselves.

A numbers game

Gov. Chris Christie answers questions during a town hall meeting today in Sayreville.

The state got some good news today as its unemployment rate dropped for the third-straight month to reach its lowest level in four years. The rate now stands at 8.7 percent, the lowest level of the Christie administration.

Gov. Chris Christie, speaking to a packed house at a town hall meeting in Sayreville today credited his tax policies and touted his balanced budget. But it is unclear exactly what is driving the numbers.

According to the press release issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the state Department of Labor and Workforce Development, 4,100 jobs were added in April by the private sector, with a total of 131,500 being added since February 2010.

“The marked decline in unemployment over the last year mainly reflects the ongoing gains in jobs we are experiencing. April saw the largest 12-month gain in the number of employed residents that New Jersey has seen in seven years, with an increase of more than 60,000 compared to April 2012,” said Charles Steindel, Chief Economist for the New Jersey Department of Treasury.

New Jersey Policy Perspective, however, saw the report as mixed, at best. Its president, Gordon MacInnes, issues the following statement:

“While we’re certainly glad to see New Jersey’s jobless rate drop below 9 percent for the first time since 2009, it would be foolish to claim victory and to assume that the state’s economy has recovered. It hasn’t. There remain 400,000 people officially looking for work and many more who have given up, our jobless rate remains much higher than the nation’s, and New Jersey has still recovered less than half the jobs it lost in the Great Recession, while neighbors like New York have recovered all of them plus added even more. Add to that the relatively low-wage nature of our new jobs, and it’s clear: New Jersey needs to do more to create good jobs.”

What I find striking is how easy it is to use the numbers to prove nearly any point you need to make.
The fact is that the state’s economy, like the national one, remains badly flawed and in need of help. Just cutting taxes is not going to do it.
Send me an e-mail.

The IRS scandal: What’s the context?

Context is everything, and David Cay Johnston, the nation’s preeminent tax-policy journalist, provides just that for the IRS scandal. As I said yesterday in a tweet, the issue is only partly about the targeting of GOP-leaning organizations. That, of course, never should have happened. But there also is a question about how 501(c)(4)s are treated more generally.

As Johnston points out, there is supposed to be a “distinction between groups that are ‘primarily engaged’ in politics and groups that really are primarily engaged in ‘social welfare'” and “‘promoting the common good and social welfare of the community,’” though the distinction is “kind of mushy.”

The issue, he said, is that

the social welfare tax exemption is being used by existing 501(c)(4) organizations, including some very large ones, to promote partisan political interests—the very activity Congress has explicitly prohibited for a century.

Of potentially greater concern, however, is that “the IRS is drowning,” with a 17 percent cut in its per capita budget since 2002 and a growing list of duties. Essentially, Congress, which has never been particularly friendly to the taxman, “is demanding that the agency do more and more with less and less,” which has left undermanned at a time it is faced with a surge in the number of 501(c)(4) — 2,774 in 2012, compared with 1,777 in 2011 and 1,741 in 2010.

None of this excuses the targeting of conservative political groups. All indications are that it was a mix of overzealousness in attempting to preserve the social welfare aspect of the 501(c)(3) status and incompetence by managers who failed to set functional policy. These failures, however, have placed the IRS squarely in the crosshairs of the GOP, which sees its chance to tar the Obama administration with scandal.

The Obama administration appears to have moved quickly on this, but it needs to be prepared for the expected — and necessary — Congressional hearings. It need to be open and truthful and the GOP, for its part, needs to avoid the temptation to grandstand and go for political points. The truth of what happened is much more important than the politics and needs to be uncovered so that this kind of thing can be prevented in the future. That likely will mean safeguards against IRS overreach,  but it also should include a reconsideration of the social-welfare tax exemption so that it is more tightly worded and less prone to political manipulation.

Send me an e-mail.