The Struggle Worsens for those who Struggle in Normal Times

We watch the news: Job losses. Ventilator shortages. Drive-through testing sites at capacity. New York is running out of hospital beds. This is what why public health officials say we need to flatten the curve — to slow the spread of the coronavirus and allow us to provide healthcare without being overwhelmed, which is likely to lead to shortages and rationing. It’s what we’ve witnessed in Italy, and we would be foolish to assume that it can’t happen here.

But we’re healthy. We’re stocked up, prepared for the most part. This is not the case for all. The Times today reports on what it calls the “most vulnerable,” those in refugee camps who have fled war and famine and are packed into camps that lack even the most basic sanitary conditions. “(I)nternational health experts and aid workers,” the Times reports, “are increasingly worried that the virus could ravage the world’s most vulnerable people: the tens of millions forced from their homes by violent conflict.”

Read the full story here.

Social Darwinism Rears Its Ugly Head

Trump & Co. Look to the Cost-Benefit Analysis to Justify Leaving the Vulnerable to Battle COVID-19 on Their Own

Donald Trump, much of the right, many on Wall Street, and centrists like Thomas L. Friedman are ready for the economy to “return to normal” (whatever that means) at the cost of an untold number of lives.

The New York Times this morning wrote that this group has begun “questioning whether the government had gone too far and should instead lift restrictions that are already inflicting deep pain on workers and businesses.” This is despite a consensus among health officials and scientists that “the best way to defeat the virus is to order nonessential businesses to close and residents to confine themselves at home.”

The argument being made by these folks, bluntly, is that the costs to the economy outweigh the benefits of saving lives.

“We cannot let the cure be worse than the problem itself,” Trump said during his briefing yesterday, and while he did not say it specifically, it is clear that he has started applying a cost-benefit analysis that privileges capital and the stock market over the lives of Americans, especially those who are most vulnerable.

Read the full essay here.

COVID-19 Cases Continue to Rise in State

The number of cases in the Garden State is approaching 3,000 Gov. Phil Murphy said during today’s daily press briefing, with cases in Middlesex County passing 200.

South Brunswick reported yesterday that a seventh person tested positive in the township, even as residents continue to bunker in in their homes under orders from Murphy.

Read the post here and sign up as a patron to help me continue posting local news and commentary.

20200316_covid_large

Rationalizing Racism: On Naming COVID-19 the ‘Chinese Virus’

If You Insist on Tying it to the Chinese People, You Just May Be a Racist

President Donald Trump and his supporters’ insistence on naming the current Coronavirus outbreak the Chinese or Wuhan Virus is having real-world consequences. As I wrote a few days ago, this is not just a theoretical complaint. It is not just some snowflake-liberal overreaction. People are being put in danger because the president, Republicans in Congress, and Trump’s followers insist on disregarding World Health Organization naming conventions for viral outbreaks and linking COVID-19 to the Chinese.

Read the story at Medium.