Tennessee is bringing back the electric chair.
I hope that shocks you. I hope it repulses you. But before you give in to that revulsion or shock, ask yourself this: Why doesn’t the use of a drug cocktail bother you the way the electric chair does? What makes the medicalization of capital punishment by forcibly causing someone to overdose on drugs less barbaric than running thousands of volts of power through his body?
These are the operative questions as we move forward, as we try to deal with the aftermath of the nearly botched execution in Oklahoma (I say “nearly botched,” because the inmate ultimately died, which is the point). As Think Progress points out, “lethal injection is commonly viewed as a less barbaric way to kill inmates than more primitive methods such as the electric chair.” But this view is based solely on the notion that there is a nice way to take a life, that the entire business of state-sanctioned revenge killing (if we are honest with ourselves we would admit that the death penalty is about nothing more than revenge) is not, in and of itself, an act of barbarity.
Albert Camus, the French novelist and philosopher, raises this question in “Reflections on the Guillotine” calling the death penalty a form of premeditated murder that leaves the condemned man to face “the horror of his situation,” which “is served up to him at every moment for months on end. Torture by hope alternates only with the pangs of animal despair” To medicalize it with a drug cocktail does nothing to ameliorate this, to make it any less barbaric. It remains, as he says, a premeditated act of revenge perpetrated by the state, no matter how cleverly we attempt to cloak it in the garb of respectability.
Tennessee’s decision to bring back the electric chair may seem shocking, but all it does is lift the veil.
***
Postscript: Here, again, is my most recent column on the issue in The Progressive Populist.
Send me an e-mail.
I am opposed to the death penalty because innocent people do wind up in prison and on death row. God only knows how many innocent people have been executed over the decades. It is a double whammy because an innocent person has been jailed or executed and the guilty party is free to commit more crimes or murders. The far right wingnut/Fox News/Hannity/Limbaugh attitude is to kill and punish and then kill some more, they love the death penalty. Corzine did the right thing by abolishing the death penalty in NJ but he should probably be prosecuted for his financial nonfeasance and/or malfeasance after his governorship.