Dispatches: Removing redundancies(i.e., the merger moment)

This week’s Dispatches focuses on the need to reduce the number of municipalities in the state, pegged to a proposal from Assembly Speaker Joe Roberts that he says will streamline the new process.

And, as we speak, the Morris County towns of Chester Borough and Chester Township are floating the idea of becoming one municipality.

Bill Cogger and Dennis Verbaro, the mayors of the two municipalities, are meeting today with state officials to explore what it would take to formally become one community, given Gov. Jon Corzine’s effort to drive down the cost of state government by encouraging the mergers of small towns such as the Chesters.

“Merging is a desire both communities wish to explore,” said Cogger, who is mayor of Chester Township. “We’re hoping the (state) government will pass legislation to make the process easier and will make good on its offer to not penalize taxpayers.”

The issues faced in the Chesters appear similar to those that would face other communities — the two Princetons, for instance, or the two Hopewells. Or Monroe and Jamesburg. The difference with Monroe and Jamesburg, of course, is that they do not share a name, though their history is intertwined. Before the late 1800s, Jamesburg was part of Monroe, serving as the town’s business center. And Monroe and Jamesburg kids have always attended high school together — first at Jamesburg High School and then at Monroe Township High School.

All of these towns could achieve some savings — a point that those who refuse to acknowledge. Some, like former Chester Township Mayor Ken Caro, points the finger at larger cities to essentially throw the dogs of the scent.

“(Town mergers) is a myth perpetrated by the state to get the monkey off their back,” Caro said.

“Trenton is afraid to address the real problem — that spending in big cities is what’s out of control. (Former Newark Mayor) Sharpe James stole more in a year than we could save in a hundred in Chester.”

This, of course, perpetuates another myth — that corruption accounts for the lion’s share of excess spending in the state. Corruption is a problem, both in terms of wasted money and confidence in government, but it is foolish to assume that ending corruption will fix our fiscal problems all by itself.

There are 13 elected officials representing Monroe and Jamesburg, two clerks, two administrators, two police chiefs, etc. Merging the two towns would cut all of this in half. Merging also would expand other opportunities — residents would get the benefit of an economy of scale that doesn’t exist now.

Other towns — the Princetons, for instance — would see less direct economic benefit because they share most of the major spending items, but they likely would still see some savings.

Should all of these towns be merged? No. But we should be looking at potential mergers and asking serious questions that, in the end, could result in a reduction in the number of towns and school districts, a reconfiguration of the state’s counties, etc.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

At least it’s not just Jersey

Rising property taxes are a problem across the country, according to The Wall Street Journal. I wish that made me feel better about the mess here in the good old Garden State.

It doesn’t, of course. I just wish it did.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Dispatches: Corzine’s losing bet

There are a lot of flaws with the governor’s toll-hike plan, as I point out in my Dispatches column and Charles Stiles points out in this column, but I have to wonder whether Gov. Jon Corzine is really ready to listen.

He has asked for alternatives, but how willing is he to consider them?

The Tri-State Transportation Committee offers a way to cut down on the transportation costs — basically, by rethinking the state’s approach to what it spends its cash on. Most interesting to me is this:

Include a fix-it-first mandate in the asset monetization legislation. To ensure that New Jersey continues to reduce its backlog of roads and bridges in poor condition, fix-it-first legislation should be included within the asset monetization plan. The legislation could require that 4% or less of transportation dollars raised by the plan go to expanding roadways, for example. Currently, less than 3% of NJDOT’s transportation program is spent on expansion, a trend that should extend to the other transportation agencies in the state.

The state has a woeful record of keeping its roads, bridges and rail lines up to day — as the governor has acknowledged — so it needs to make this a priority and enshrine this priority in state law.

The governor also should follow the prescription offered by New Jersey Policy Perspective and include a gas tax increase in the plan. As I’ve said, the state may need to raise tolls to cover rising costs, do some needed maintenance and even pay down some of the toll road debt, but a mix of other options — gas tax, income tax, budget cuts, consolidation, etc. — has to be on the table. Solely relying on tolls is foolish politically and generally unfair.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

I hope the governor is not surprised

Poll numbers released today by Quinnipiac University show in statistical black and white that the governor’s toll hike plan is unpopular and that its unpopularity has voters in an ornery mood. The governor’s disapproval raiting is strikingly high — 52 percent, the highest of his term in office. (That said, he remains far more popular than President George W. Bush. But then most people are these days, with the possible exception of Roger Clemens.)

I can understand the numbers, though I do think they are a bit unfair. But that is politics. The governor is making a good-faith effort to fix a problem that has been growing for a dozen years, a problem that presents no easy or painless solutions. So he catches grief.

I agree that his toll plan is the wrong approach, but I also think he is being far more realistic than most of the elected officials in this state — and more realistic than most voters.

I keep having this same conversation with people. They complain about the plan, but offer the same cliched response — eliminate waste and corruption. I say, “great,” but how much of the budget do you think that accounts for?” No answer. Once you back out the debt, pension and other fixed payments, you’re left with maybe $15 billion in spending to tackle, maybe not even that much. If waste and corruption account for 10 percent — an absurdly generous assumption — you still manage to trim just $1.5 billion, about 40 percent of what would be needed to plug what has been a recurring hole. And it still leaves you dealing with future budgets.

I’ve said it before. We need to be realistic and we need to be comprehensive. Everything has to be on the table — streamlining government at all levels, cutting spending, redirecting money to where it is most necessary (antipoverty programs, for instance), reducing the local portion of the school tax bill by increasing school aid, cutting corruption, controlling debt. The list is endless, so we better get started.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Deconstructing the fair tax

Jay Bookman of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution offers a pretty succinct dissection of Mike Huckabee’s fair-tax plan, showing how it is really nothing more than conservative fool’s gold and bad news for working people.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.