I know this is a big news story, but is it really a surprise to anyone? We know the state faces another massive shortfall, which made it fairly certain that no one would be seeing more state money come their way.
And yet, one has to wonder if there is some way this governor can find money for schools to keep districts from another round of teacher layoffs and to minimize tax increases.
The difficulty I have with the way in which Gov. Chris Christie has gone about his budgeting is that he has failed to engage the state in a discussion of priorities and instead has moved forward with his own conservative goals while allowing taxpayers to assume that he is only cutting waste.
I have no real sense that New Jerseyans understand that slashing aid to schools and towns means an equivalent slashing of services. Fewer teachers mean larger class sizes, while schools have had to resort to pay-to-play for sports and extracurricular activities, fewer elective courses and less building maintenance to offset their lost aid. Municipal governments face similar problems. (Imposing spending caps do little to address these problems, but certainly make the politicians feel good about themselves.)
Should the state increase income taxes on higher-income residents? What about corporations? What if the higher tax rate prevented cuts to health-care, AIDS and senior programs?
And what about consolidating municipal and school services and outright mergers of towns? The governor alludes to this idea, but has not forced it onto the agenda.
Part of the problem, of course, is the decaying status of the state’s newspaper industry — layoffs and cutbacks have forced a joint Statehouse bureau into existence, which has left both The Star-Ledger and Bergen Record unable to perform their watchdog functions with the same zeal as in the past.
We need to have these discussions; if we don’t, we are just shooting in the dark, which makes it more likely that we will hit innocent bystanders.