Rutgers gets blitzed by committee

I graduated from Rutgers in 1988 with a degree in English and have been a backer of the school as an academic institution since before I arrived on campus as a junior, having transferred in from Middlesex County College and Penn State.

That the school has a stellar academic reputation was hammered home to me in the fall of 1989. I was entering my one and only year of graduate school at Rutgers, joining students from Brown and Berkeley and other notable schools. I was talking with one of the students, who came from one of the Ivy League schools, when he asked where I earned my undergraduate degree.

“Rutgers,” I replied.

“Rutgers? Wow,” was his answer.

That short exchange has stuck with me, and I’ve used it when doubters criticize Rutgers’ as an academic institution.

The sports program is another story. It’s history is, at best, uneventful — a couple of good basketball seasons (a magical 1975-1976 season that saw the team make the Final Four, the football team a couple of years ago, and the girls basketball team).

Administrators have periodically focused their attention on athletics, but it only is in recent years that the university has committed serious money to turning Rutgers into a big-time football program.

The result — disappointment on the field after the team’s surprising 2006 season and questions about the impact that spending on football has had on other sports and other programs. (A report issued last week called for tighter controls and more transparency in the department after a sports marketing contract was issued without formal bidding, its stadium expansion failed to gain funding and it extended the contract of football coach Greg Schiano.)

The New York Times referred to the assorted failures as “The Rutgers Mess .”

Rutgers, the biggest and most important public university in New Jersey, has spent millions of dollars furthering its ambition to become a major football power that might otherwise have been devoted to academics. It has done so during a period of rising tuition and budgetary cutbacks in academic departments, and, worse, without any real oversight from the university’s president, Richard McCormick, and its Board of Governors.

A review committee appointed by Mr. McCormick has now issued a scathing report accusing him of being “too passive in exercising his authority” over the athletic department and football program. The report suggests that he and the board turned a blind eye while the university’s athletic director, Robert Mulcahy, signed the football coach to multimillion-dollar contracts and employed a sports marketing firm that once hired Mr. Mulcahy’s son. It also criticizes a secret side deal engineered by Mr. Mulcahy in which the marketing firm paid the football coach an extra $250,000.

The criticisms are warranted, the Times says, because these “efforts to make Rutgers a football powerhouse” have caused other programs to suffer.

To save money, the university has downgraded teams including tennis, swimming and fencing to intramural status.

Rutgers, of course, is not the only school to go through this. Every big-time football and basketball program creates a conflict, sucking up more than its share of money at the expense of other sports programs and even academics. Debate over Notre Dame’s recent football failures has focused on the school’s strict academic standards, as if the school should lessen them just to accommodate someone who can toss a football 70 yards in the air and hit a sprinting receiver.

The most calling aspect of all of this is the phone calls I continue to receive from the Rutgers alumni group seeking money. Given the massive contract that Greg Schiano has and the amount of cash being spent on a stadium I have yet to step foot in, it is no accident that I have yet to turn over one thin dime. The money that is being spent on the football stadium could be better spent on other campus needs.

Amid all this, of course, comes the news that National Book Award winning poet Mark Doty will be teaching at Rutgers beginning in the fall 2009 — evidence that the school will continue to have one of the premiere English Departments on the East Coast. And that’s what this school should be focused on.

I root for Rutgers every week, but if they don’t win I can live with it. I’d rather the school remain a top-notch academic institution, even if it means never winning another football game.

(South Brunswick resident Lew Schwartz, an alumni of the school like myself, will offer a commentary on the report next week in the South Brunswick Post.)

Questionable financing for stadium

Charles Stile in The Record puts into words the uneasy feeling I felt about the private fundraising effort announced by Gov. Jon Corzine and state Sen. Ray Lesniak to make the Rutgers football stadium expansion a reality.

The governor was right to strip the project of state funding, given the sorry state of New Jersey’s finances. But his basic character flaw — a need to make everyone happy — has resulted in a flawed approach to the funding the project.

There are several problems.

First, as Stile points out, the Corzine/Lesniak plan creates the potential for influence peddling.

Alumni, students and small businesses are likely contributors. But if those donations are classified as confidential, charitable contributions, what’s to stop, say, auto insurance carriers, utilities, casinos and other state-regulated industries from pumping piles of campaign cash toward the cause?

What about developers, facing trouble with wetlands applications at the Department of Environmental Protection? And how about all those contractors barred from making political contributions by the state’s pay-to-play bans? Here’s a chance to give without fear of penalty — or public disclosure.

In essence, the stadium campaign has the potentail to drill massive holes in efforts to break the grip that campaign donors have on the legislative process. Pay-to-play restrictions, public financing, lobbying disclosure, all go out the window if the same people who are prohibited from contributing to the governor or a senate campaign or who are limited can then give for one of Gov. Corzine or Sen. Lesniak’s pet projects.

The second issue I have with the expansion and the fundraising is that the money could be used to bring back some other, smaller sports or to fund academics. The desire on the part of Rutgers — my alma mater — to be a bigtime football program is understandable.

But Rutgers’ mission is not and should not be to field a great football team. Its mission should be to provide a great learning environment for its students and to expand college opportunities for as many New Jersey residents who want to attend and have the grades and test scores to get in. That would mean finding way to reduce tuition for all, or at least subisidize it to a greater degree for most.

The Scarlet Knights’ mediocre 2007 season should be a reminder that football success is fleeting. The school’s reputation as a quality university should not be.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.