A return to normalcy

The poll results released today from the Polling Institute at Monmouth University should not really be a surprise to anyone. No one really knows who Rob Andrews or any of the Republicans are in the U.S. Senate race and Gov. Jon Corzine remains mired in Bush-like approval ratings.

New Jersey voters also — and this is a bit of a surprise — now seem to favor Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, almost three months after backing Clinton in the primary. According to the poll, more 45 percent of Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents say they would like to see Obama get the nomination, compared with 38 percent for Clinton.

“It appears that less than three months after giving Hillary Clinton a 10 point victory in the state’s primary, some New Jersey voters feel buyer’s remorse,” said poll director Patrick Murray. “Many state Democrats are concerned that the prolonged battle could hobble their party’s eventual nominee in November.”

Obama received 44 percent of the vote on Feb. 5, so his support appears to have held steady. It is the Clinton supporters who appear to be moving to the undecided column. Of course, it is possible that the inclusion of “Democrat-leaning independents” is skewing the results.

Of more importance, the normal course of things has been restored. Several months ago, Sen. John McCain appeared to be closing on the Democrats in New Jersey, making a reliably blue state far more competitive than the Democrats would have liked.

But the latest numbers indicate that New Jersey is likely to back the Democrat, regardless of who it is: 57 percent say they plan to vote for the Democrat, 25 percent for the Republican and the rest either will back a third-party candidate, don’t know or plan to stay home.

An Obama-McCain race would likely produce a 56-32 win for Obama, while a Clinton McCain race would go 52-38 for Clinton.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Wrights and wrongs

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright should leave the public stage.

I wasn’t prepared to write this — his basic critique of American imperialism and capitalism are not too far off base — but having absorbed his ego-driven performance on Monday morning, what else can I say.

Actually, Joan Walsh on Salon put it best in a Monday post:

He may be wounded, but this is a man of enormous self-regard, and he’s clearly trying to hurt Barack Obama. His national rehabilitation tour started fairly sympathetically with the Moyers conversation, but it’s devolved into self-pity and self-glorification ever since. His Sunday night talk to the NAACP was mostly silly, from the questionable science behind his insistence that black children are right-brained (creative) while white children are left-brained (logical and analytical) to his mocking the way white people talk, dance, clap, worship and sing. I understand and agree with Wright’s notion that “different is not deficient,” but mocking white people, including JFK and LBJ, doesn’t seem like the best way to get his point across (yes, he was talking to the NAACP, but he knew — and relished — that he had a national audience). At his Monday speech he insisted attacks on him were really an attack on the black church, a typically Wright-centric view of the world, while his security was reportedly provided by the Nation of Islam.

Wright, as Walsh points out, is a full-blown narcissist concerned only with his own reputation and apparently unconcerned with the issues he says he believes are important.

Both Bob Herbert and Eugene Robinson — two of the best columnists in the newspaper business, both of whom happen to be black, turned their rhetorical guns on the Rev. Wright and his outsized ego, criticizing him for raising himself up as a stand-in for the black church in America.

Here’s Herbert:

Smiling, cracking corny jokes, mugging it up for the big-time news media — this reverend is never going away. He’s found himself a national platform, and he’s loving it.

It’s a twofer. Feeling dissed by Senator Obama, Mr. Wright gets revenge on his former follower while bathed in a spotlight brighter than any he could ever have imagined. He’s living a narcissist’s dream. At long last, his 15 minutes have arrived.

So there he was lecturing an audience at the National Press Club about everything from the black slave experience to the differences in sentencing for possession of crack and powdered cocaine.

All but swooning over the wonderfulness of himself, the reverend acts like he is the first person to come up with the idea that blacks too often get the short end of the stick in America, that the malignant influences of slavery and the long dark night of racial discrimination are still being felt today, that in many ways this is a profoundly inequitable society.

This is hardly new ground. The question that cries out for an answer from Mr. Wright is why — if he is so passionately committed to liberating and empowering blacks — does he seem so insistent on wrecking the campaign of the only African-American ever to have had a legitimate shot at the presidency.

The answer, as Herbert points out, is that Wright wants this to be about Wright.

My guess is that Mr. Wright felt he’d been thrown under a bus by an ungrateful congregant who had benefited mightily from his association with the church and who should have rallied to his former pastor’s defense. What we’re witnessing now is Rev. Wright’s “I’ll show you!” tour.

And show he has. Wright has decided that not only is the Obama campaign a slap in his face, but he has conflated himself with the black church, as Robinson says.

I would never try to diminish the service he performed as pastor of his Chicago megachurch, and it’s obvious that he’s a man of great charisma and faith. But this media tour he’s conducting is doing a disservice that goes beyond any impact it might have on Obama’s presidential campaign.

The problem is that Wright insists on being seen as something he’s not: an archetypal representative of the African American church. In fact, he represents one twig of one branch of a very large tree.

It’s understandable, given how Wright has been treated, that he would want to attempt to set the record straight. No one would enjoy seeing his 36-year career reduced to a couple of radioactive sound bites. No preacher would want his entire philosophy to be assessed on the basis of a few rhetorical excesses committed in the heat of a passionate sermon. No former Marine would stomach having his love of country questioned by armchair patriots who have done far less to protect the United States from its enemies.

Given Wright’s long silence, I thought he had taken to heart Jesus’s admonition to turn the other cheek. Obviously, I was wrong.

I’m through with Wright not because he responded — in similar circumstances, I certainly couldn’t have kept silent — but because his response was so egocentric. We get it, Rev. Wright: You’re ready for your close-up.

What all this means for Barack Obama is difficult to say, but it has allowed Hillary Clinton to reframe the election on racial terms and set the stage for what is likely to be a gruesome general election campaign in which the ugly racial politics that have been an undercurrent of national Republican politics since the 1960s will once again be a major theme.

I wish it wasn’t so, but the cynic in me knows better.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

The Rev. Wright speaks

The talking heads — not the band — on cable were wondering why the Rev. Jeremiah Wright would consider appearing on television — on Bill Moyers Journal tonight at 9 and Sunday at 7 p.m. — and what his appearance might mean. Interesting way to approach it, I guess, but one that completely missed the point.

Imagine if you had three or four snippets of sermons you had given over a multi-decade career broadcast out of context as weapons in a presidential race, weapons designed to inject the issue of race at a time when a black candidate had become the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination and the favorite to win the White House. Imagine that the furor resulted in your name being transformed into an epithet, that the substance of your critiques is ignored and the inflammatory language used is all that survives in the public’s mind. You’d want a chance to respond, to restore the context to your words — especially knowing that they will be replayed over and over again for the next six-and-a-half months.

As for the impact that his interview might have, well, how could it be anymore damaging than the way his sermons had been misused up to this point? That’s Dana Milbank’s take, speaking on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, he offers this:

Well, the tape will be there and available now. But this story would reignite if and when Obama is the nominee and then John McCain and his surrogates bring it up again. So, probably no harm in just getting that on the record.

Here is Barack Obama’s response today.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Willie Horton is alive and well and on the interweb

I received what can only be described as a hideous and blatantly racist e-mail today from an organization called Right v. Left, which is launching something called exposeobama.org and plans to run something it is calling a “Horton” ad. You know, “Horton,” as in Willie Horton.

The rhetoric of the e-mail is rather ugly and I’ve gone back and forth over whether I should share any of it. But I think it is necessary so that everyone understands the kind of ugliness that still exists in the hearts of too many Americans.

A taste:

“President Barack Hussein Obama,” those have to be the scariest four words in the English language!

  • Ask yourself… do you really want the next President of the United States of America to be a man with ties to known Marxists such as Frank Marshall Davis and terrorists such as Bill Ayers and former PLO operative Rashid Khalidi?
  • Consider the fact that Barack Hussein Obama refuses to wear the flag on his lapel, or that he does not place his hand over his heart in the presence of the American flag.
  • Consider the fact that Barack Hussein Obama embraces Jeremiah Wright, a man who has preached the most vile racial hatred and anti-American sentiments from the pulpit for twenty years, while at the same time Barack Hussein Obama accuses decent hard-working Americans of bigotry when he says things like, “It’s not surprising that they get bitter. They cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them… .”
  • Consider the fact that Barack Hussein Obama’s wife Michelle said that her husband’s candidacy marked, “the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country.”

But what really makes “President Barack Hussein Obama” the scariest four words in the English language is that fact that HE CAN BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

The Web site is no better. The organization bills itself as the National Campaign Fund and says it is not affiliated with any candidate, but it boasts the man who crafted the original Willie Horton ad and a former advisor to rightwing Republican candidates as members of the “team.” the organization is seeking to raise $300,000 so it can start running Swiftboat-style ads that distort Obama’s record in an effort to cut the Democratic front-runner off at the knees.

It is a despicable way to campaign, but the GOP has never been shy about resorting to such tactics — especially the rightwing fringe. The list is long and brutal, beginning with Ronald Reagan’s visit to Philadelphia, Miss., in support of state’s rights in 1980 (actually, he’d made the use of coded racial language a central element of his political rhetoric as early as the mid-1960s when he first ran for governor of California); the Willie Horton ad; Gennifer Flowers and Paula Jones; Whitewater; the Swiftboats, etc.

Admittedly, this e-mail and ad come from a group at the fringes, one working at the margins of acceptable GOP discourse. But that does not mean that the Republicans won’t be happy to have them working the dark side for them. Groups like the Swiftboaters and Expose Obama allow people like Karl Rove to stay a little above the fray, allowing this nonsense to seep into the public discussion without it appearing to come from the mainstream.

In case Keith Olbermann is reading this blog (not likely, I know), I nominate the folks at Expose Obama and the National Campaign Fund for today’s “Worst Persons in the World.”

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.