Dispatches: A tortured judgmentand an update on Mukasey

Dispatches is up — on the problems with the Mukasey nomination.

And here is an update on the nomination — the Democrats may hold it up pending an answer on the torture question.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Another critic heard from on Mukasey;this time from the right

Saw this on Chris Suellentrop’s Opinionator blog on the New York Times and thought I’d pass along the link. Essentially, we have a conservative (Ron Dreher) who finds significant constitutional issues in Judge Michael Mukasey’s answers to questions on torture and executive power.

I say they shouldn’t vote for him, period. This country cannot afford an attorney general who believes that executive power should be expanded so greatly. I don’t care if the office sits vacant until Bush is out of office. The line has to be drawn by the Senate.

Read my Dispatches column tomorrow for my take (Hint: It is the same as Ron Dreher’s.)

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Just say no, Part 3

This analysis from today’s Times should give Senators voting on the Mukasey nomination pause. This is not about Bush, but about presidential power — I’d ask conservatives to consider whether they are prepared to hand the kind of executive authority they envision for President Bush to a Democrat. I think we all know the answer to that.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.