Maddow cheerleads

Rachel Maddow, speaking after the president’s speech during MSNBC’s analysis, said something that puzzled me and really raises questions about whether she is anything more than a cheerleader for Obama.

I like Maddow, generally, but how she can think that this speech “neutralizes” critics is beyond me. The left certainly will not be pacified by this speech because the antiwar left knows that you can’t call an escalation a withdrawal (thanks to Bob Witanek for this line of thinking). The right, on the other hand, would criticize Obama for killing Osama bin Laden with his bare hands, their hatred for the president running so deep that it blinds them to reason.

And the independents? As Chris Matthews said (did I just write that?), they are weary of the war and want it to end.

The political analysis, of course, is the problem, whether it is Maddow cheerleading for the president or Fox making things up to make him look bad. Political analysis, however, is limited and empty. What we need is real policy analysis and real information.

We already have spent too many lives — on both sides — and money. We need to get out and get out quickly.

The big announcement — it’s Tiger, not Afghanistan that leads the news

President Barack Obama is less than 24 hours from officially announcing a massive expansion of the war effort in Afghanistan and, yet, the lead story on tonights CBS news on channel 2 was about Tiger Woods (and no story on the war, whatsoever). It’s as if the folks at CBS New York read Chris Hedges’ Truthdig column today and wanted to prove him right.

Oh, no! Moyers is retiring

David Sirota sums up this news in a tweet:

This is EXTREMELY bad news for the already-dying world of serious journalism

Yes, Bill Moyers is retiring, meaning the Journal will end — at the same time that Now, the show he created and that David Brancaccio stewarded so well is being cancelled. Maybe it’s time to get rid of the television.