Tag: Iraq

President George W. Bush was at his disingenuous best yesterday, speaking before a supportive crowd at a Fairfax, Va., American Legion post, blaming Democrats and claiming for himself the ultimate right to set all policy — even those prerogatives given by the Founders to Congress.

The speech was full of a lot of spin — rosy pictures of progress in Iraq and all that. But what made the news — and it was the only news in the speech, really — was his direct attackon the Democratic leadership for, in his words, “substitut(ing) the judgment of politicians in Washington for the judgment of our commanders on the ground.”

The president, of course, was using the speech to push his agenda — a prolonged war that is stretching the military beyond its limits, while doing little to quell the smoldering civil war in Iraq.

The funding issue is a bit of a red herring, of course. The president could very well sign the Congressional bill, but that would require him to acknowledge that Congress is a co-equal branch of government and that the system of governance we live under is designed to encourage compromise.

Instead, we get this:

Now, the Democrats who pass these bills know that I’ll veto them, and they know that this veto will be sustained. Yet they continue to pursue the legislation. And as they do, the clock is ticking for our troops in the field.

The focus is on “Congress’s failure,” which he says will lead to reduced training, equipment shortages and the like — all things that the military has been living with thanks to Donald Rumsfeld (remember “you go to war with the army you have”?), Dick Cheney and our petulant president.

Then, what do you expect from a president who has based his entire term on the reckless and arrogant disregard for anything other than partisanship and spin?

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

Resolve? We’ve had four years of resolve that has resulted in more than 3,200 dead American soldiers — along with thousands who have sustained debilitating injuries — and thousands upon thousands of Iraqis killed in combat and by the chaos that has come to replace Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime.

And yet, after four years of resolve, four years in which we’ve shown too much patience for a deceiptful and incompetent presidential administration, we are being told that more patience is in order, that we must avoid the temptation “to look at the challenges in Iraq and conclude our best option is to pack up and go home.”

That may be satisfying in the short run, but I believe the consequences for American security would be devastating. If American forces were to step back from Baghdad before it is more secure, a contagion of violence could spill out across the entire country. In time, this violence could engulf the region.

I’d like to believe that our presence in Iraq may lead to greater security. But the evidence is just not there. Various reports from the region — from sources unaffiliated with the administration — have indicated that the so-called surge has forced the insurgents underground, but only temporarily.

That has created an illusion of calm, they say, even as the many bombings continue. The Guardian of London, for instance, reports that

Despite the month-long security crackdown in the capital, six people were killed and 30 injured in a car bomb blast in a Shia suburb yesterday. In all, 24 corpses were found in different parts of the city.

None of this should be a surprise. In many ways, it is the American presence that is exacerbating the situation.

H.D.S. Greenway, writing in The Boston Globe last week, made just this point:

When the president and surge proponents talk about restoring law and order to Baghdad, they underestimate the fact that it is the very presence of American soldiers themselves who are sparking the resistance, and thus the chaotic conditions in which criminals can operate, and militias appear to be the population’s only salvation. Americans may try to do their jobs humanely, but the nature of their business is coercive, brutal, and ultimately counterproductive.

So, forgive me for a lack of patience.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here