It’s first for a reason

The First Amendment Center of the Freedom Forum released its annual survey of American attitudes toward the First Amendment and, well, things are not so promising.

According to the survey,

  • 65 percent “believe that the nation’s founders intended the U.S. to be a Christian nation
  • 55 percent “believe that the Constitution establishes a Christian nation”
  • 71 percent would “limit the amount a corporation or union could contribute to a political campaign, with 64 percent favoring such a limit on individual contributions” and 62 percent limiting the “amount a person could contribute to his or her own campaign”
  • 56 percent “believe that the freedom to worship as one chooses extends to all religious groups, regardless of how extreme”
    58 percent “would prevent protests during a funeral procession, even on public streets and sidewalks”
  • 74 percent “would prevent public school students from wearing a T-shirt with a slogan that might offend others”
  • 34 percent think the press “has too much freedom,” while 60 percent do not believe “the press tries to report the news without bias” and 62 percent “believe the making up of stories is a widespread problem in the news media”
  • 25 percent said “the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.”

Not a pretty picture, as Gene Policinski, vice president and executive director of the First Amendment Center said in a release on the survey:

“Americans clearly have mixed views of what First Amendment freedoms are and to whom they should fully apply. To me the results of this year’s survey endorse the idea of more and better education for young people — our nation’s future leaders — about our basic freedoms.”

It also is worth passing along, in its entirety, this column by Charles C. Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center. It is distributed to free to news organizations:

What part of ‘secular nation’ do we not understand?
By Charles C. Haynes, First Amendment Center

While American soldiers fight to establish a secular democracy abroad, many Americans want to create a Christian nation at home.

Consider the findings of “State of the First Amendment 2007,” a national survey released this week by the First Amendment Center. Significant numbers of Americans express support for government sponsorship of the majority religion, especially in public schools:

• 58% want teacher-led prayers in schools.
• 43% endorse school holiday programs that are entirely Christian and devotional.
• 50% would allow public school teachers to teach the Bible as a “factual text” in history classes.

Despite the fact that all of the above are unconstitutional under current law, many people see nothing wrong – and much right – with school officials privileging or even endorsing the Christian faith.

Transpose the location (or substitute another religion) and the result would surely be very different. Would Americans support the creation of an Iraqi state where the majority Shiites imposed their prayers, religious celebrations, and scriptures on all Iraqi schoolchildren? Not likely.

On the contrary, we send young Americans to fight for an Iraq where people of all faiths will be protected from state-imposed religion. Why? Because we understand that (however quixotic the quest) only a secular democracy in Iraq with no established faith will guarantee religious freedom – and end sectarian strife.

Closer to home, however, many Americans seem to think our Framers had another idea. According to the First Amendment poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans (65%) agree that our nation’s founders intended the United States to be a Christian nation. Even more striking, 55% believe that the U.S. Constitution establishes a Christian nation. (For complete survey results visit http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/sofa_reports/index.aspx)

Now, it’s true that many (but not all) of our founders were Christians. And it’s true
that the Protestant majority dominated the nation’s institutions for much of our early history. But the U.S. Constitution nowhere mentions God or Christianity, an omission that was widely criticized in 1787.

In fact, the only mention of religion in the body of the Constitution (before the addition of the religious-liberty clauses of the First Amendment) is the “no religious test” for public office provision of Article VI. By ensuring that people of all faiths or none could hold office, the founders made clear their intention to found a secular republic committed to full religious freedom.

Of course, people define “Christian nation” in various ways – ranging from a nation that reflects Christian virtues to a nation where the government promotes the
Christian faith. But under any definition, the Constitution in no way establishes or creates a Christian nation.

Some might argue that teacher-led prayers or Nativity pageants in public schools are a far cry from the dangers of a Shiite (or Sunni) theocracy in Iraq. Perhaps. But the lesson of history is that when a majority uses the government to promote the majority religion, conflict and oppression inevitably follow.

That brings me to the most disturbing finding of the First Amendment Center poll: 28% of Americans believe that “freedom to worship as one chooses” was never meant to apply to religious groups that the majority of the people consider “extreme or on the fringe.”

At various times in our history, that would have meant no religious freedom for Baptists, Roman Catholics or Mormons. Today it would deny liberty to any number of small or unpopular religious groups.

Fortunately, our founders understood that the great danger of majority rule is majority denial of fundamental human rights. That’s why they wisely put some rights – religious liberty first among them – beyond the reach of majority vote.

The United States is not now and never has been a Christian nation in any official or legal sense of the term. It is precisely because we live in a secular democracy with First Amendment protections that Christians – and people of all faiths – have more freedom to practice their religion here than anywhere else on Earth.

I can only add one thing: Without the First Amendment there is no United States, or at least not the United States I know and love.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

State-sanctioned prayer?

Steven Hart offers just the right touch of sarcasm to commemorate yesterday’s state-sanctioned Day of Prayer. I’m surprised that more people aren’t bothered by this constitutionally dubious faux event.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.

Imus and the First Amendment

This is last week’s commentary from the First Amendment Center on the Imus nonsense (how I managed to miss this is beyond me). It seems the most sensible thing I’ve read, recognizing the First-Amendment rights both of the offenders and the offended:

(T)he most immediate answer to highly offensive speech is simply to stop enabling it. Change the channel, boycott the sponsor, or go to another Web site. We should do everything we can to protect the First Amendment right of people to offend, but we don’t have to pay for it.

Pretty much sums up my thoughts.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here