Protesters from the Westboro Baptist Church are not my favorite people in the world, but they have the same First Amendment rights as the rest of us regardless of the nonsense they spew or where they spew it.
But are there limits to their rights to protest — including how close they can get to their targets?
A Maryland congressman believes the answer is yes. Dutch Ruppersberger, a Maryland Democrat, “introduced legislation that would prohibit protests five hours before and five hours after military funerals, and force protestors to gather at least 2,500 feet away from the event.”
The rules, he says, “would preserve the protestors’ right to free speech without harassing the military families.”
“I didn’t like the Supreme Court decision, but I understood it,” Ruppersberger said. “But the court has recognized the right to regulate the time and place of those protests — if it’s reasonable. And I think it’s reasonable to have these families come and go to the funeral without being impacted by the protests.”
The rules, however, would render any protest moot by pushing protesters about a half mile away from their targets and using time restrictions to delink the protests from their targets. So while restrictions might be permissible, these would seem to be extreme and designed to strip the protests of their effectiveness.
Federal law already imposes restrictions on protests at military cemeteries — one hour and 500 feet — that are far less onerous and do a better job of balancing free-speech and assembly rights against the right to privacy, which is the conflict at the heart of this debate.
Any infringement on the First Amendment must be limited and must not violate its spirit. The Ruppersberger bill goes too far.
- Send me an e-mail.
- Read poetry at The Subterranean.
- Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. It can be ordered here.
- Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.
