A back-handed endorsement

Barack Obama has been a disappointment — but a fairly normative president. The problem with the presidency and American politics in general is that it rewards caution and moderation, especially when it is a supposedly liberal politician being overly cautious.

And yet, given the options, he probably should be re-elected. Robert Scheer offers a good explanation of why in what I will call the great back-handed compliment. A vote for Obama this time, unlike last time for many, is not so much to continue the status quo, but a preventative measure against elevating a confirmed liar and opportunist to the nation’s highest office.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. It can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Scheer’s clear take

Robert Scheer, in a column that I should have linked to yesterday, offers probably the clearest takeaway from Tuesday’s election results. “Hey, stupid,” to paraphrase the 1992 Clinton campaign, “it’s the economy!’

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. It can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

A popular governor without a mandate?

There are a lot of things one could say about Tuesday’s win by Linda Greenstein in the race to finish the final year of the 14th District state Senate seat, which had been held by Republicans for 19 years.

First, Greenstein had much better name recognition — she had been in the Assembly for about 10 years, while her opponent — Tom Goodwin — was a Hamilton councilman who lost an Assembly race for the same seat in 2007.

Second, we could make the argument made by Senate President Stephen Sweeney, who claims that the win is an indication that voters want the governor and Legislature to make nice (they might, but I’m not sure how the Greenstein win demonstrates this, given

Or, you could argue something I’ve been saying about Christie since he was sworn in: He may be governor, but he does not have a mandate. Remember, he won with less than 50 percent of the vote and had no coattails in 2009. And, while he may be popular in the polls, he had little impact on the races in New Jersey on Tuesday. In fact, the Greenstein win means a larger Democratic majority than Christie faced just a week ago — not exactly a glowing endorsement of his approach to fixing the state’s problems.

And the Democrats won all four special elections on the ballot Tuesday — two Assembly seats (5th and 31st) and two Senate seats (Greenstein and Donald Norcross in the 5th) — while the GOP captured county government in Bergen County and regained the third district Congressional seat won by Democrat Jon Adler two years.

If anything, New Jersey politics has grown even more muddled than before.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. It can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Don’t feel sad, get mad

The Republican Party has taken back the House of Representatives in a nasty push back against the president’s party.

There is nothing surprising here, when you consider history (the president’s party generally loses seats in a midterm) and the mix of politics (gridlock in Washington), economics (a jobless faux recovery) and culture (race and class bias, generalized fear).

The argument we are likely to hear as the days go forward is that the Democrats must move right and that liberals must trim their sales and lower their expectations. I’m not buying it.

The bulk of yesterday’s losses came from swing districts and featured Blue Dog Dems who generally sided with the GOP on the most important issues.

According to an analysis by The Huffington Post, 23 of the 46 Blue Dogs up for re-election went down on Tuesday. Notable losses included Rep. Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin (D-S.D.), the coalition’s co-chair for administration, and Rep. Baron Hill (D-Ind.), the co-chair for policy. Two members were running for higher office (both lost), three were retiring and three races were still too close to call.

The Blue Dogs, a coalition of moderate to conservative Democrats in the House, have consistently frustrated their more progressive colleagues and activists within the party, especially during the health care debate. Blue Dog members pushed to limit the scope and the cost of the legislation and resisted some of the mandates of the bill. Last summer, seven of the eight Blue Dogs on the House Energy and Commerce Committee even threatened to block health care reform unless it met their cost requirements.

So, from a progressive point of view, there is no real loss here. (More on Russ Feingols later.)

And in real terms, this changes Washington only minimally. Let’s face it, it’s not like the Democrats were pushing real progressive change or had the guts to challenge the GOP’s obstructionism. How a Republican House will shift the balance is beyond me.

But I write this from my perch as an editor of local news, far from the maddening nonsense inside the Beltway. I am not a perfectly coiffed TV personality who must impose a narrative on results to make it conform with my own preconceptions.

There are a handful of things we know for sure:

  1. The Democrats control the White House and the Senate; the Republicans control the House and a majority of statehouses.
  2. The polls show significant dissatisfaction with the direction in which the country is moving — on both sides of the political divide.
  3. And progressives allowed themselves to become dejected, watching as their political messiah failed to be sufficiently messiah-like to remake the political world.

And this last one is key. We have to stop waiting for some white knight to arrive and fix things. We have to take control ourselves, impose a narrative and program that has nothing to do with the accepted wisdom in Washington, that by-passes the liberal elite and the Democratic Party. Waiting for a savior leaves us — and by us I mean everyone, not just lefties or even Americans, but everyone — paralyzed in fear and at the mercy of the folks who control the levers of power.

It was depressing to watch the results roll in, but we cannot allow the depression to paralyze us. The left must get mad and it must get active, must ensure that an alternative set of policies and programs are on the table and that conservatives and corporatists do not have an open field on which to maneuver.

Robo calls make my skin crawl

The robo-call phenomena baffles me. Over the last few days, I have received robo calls from President Barack Obama, former Sen. Bill Bradley and a variety of local and regional folks. And it’s not over, at least for another 30 hours.

The notion that a recorded phone call from some famous person is considered a good use of a campaign’s resources just doesn’t seem logical, given how distasteful most people find telemarketers — and politicians.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. it can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.