Public job cuts are not making things better

Isn’t this what we’ve been saying — that slashing government payrolls at a time of high unemployment only worsens the employment picture? Today’s job numbers would have shown growth, except that local and state governments have been forced to eliminate jobs.

Companies added 64,000 jobs last month, after having added 93,000 jobs in August, the Labor Department reported Friday. But over all, the economy shed 95,000 nonfarm jobs in September, the result of a 159,000 decline in government jobs at all levels. Local governments in particular cut jobs at the fastest rate in almost 30 years.

“We need to wake up to the fact that the end of the stimulus has really hit hard on local governments,” said Andrew Stettner, deputy director of the National Employment Law Project. “There is much more of a slide in the job market than what we really need to clearly turn around.”

But the federal government, which can run a deficit, can’t pump money into local budgets to save jobs, which would stabilize other areas of the economy and so on.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. it can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Consequences: The unemployed, benefits and Republican recalcitrance

Republicans spent a number of months holding up basic benefits — in the form of a much-needed extension — for unemployed Americans. Their stated reason: The deficit.

The move was both heartless (longterm unemployment is reaching record levels) and foolish (aid to the unemployed gets cycled right back into the economy in the form of spending).

The question remains, however, will the GOP be made to pay for the political posturing. The pundit class doesn’t think so, saying that anger will be focused on incumbents over the general state of the economy. There is some truth to this, though the generally terrible quality of GOP candidates is likely to save the jobs of some Democrats who should be joining the unemployed in seeking work.

There also is the very real possibility that unemployed Americans — about 14.6 million at the moment, not including the millions who are under-employed — will remember the way they were treated by the GOP and the distortions tossed into the political dialogue by people like Sharron Angle and others.

That’s the point of this story from The Washington Independent, which explains how comments by Paul, Angle and others “began reverberating in what might be termed the unemployed netroots — a system of highly trafficked, influential blogs and sites connecting the jobless and updating them, often in minute detail, about ins and outs of Congress’ work on unemployment issues.”

During the eight month battle to extend unemployment insurance, with the unemployment rate peaking over 10 percent, huge online networks of the unemployed came into fruition. Now, coming into the fall and the midterms, King and other grassroots organizers for the unemployed are hooking up with formal organizing groups to add institutional oomph to the effort. They say they do not want to let the long battle for simple extensions go to waste.

Already, a number of unions and other organizations have created dedicated working groups or online organizations for the jobless. Last year, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, a labor union, founded the Ur Union of Unemployed, or U-Cubed, for jobless workers. Additionally, the AFL-CIO’s Working America affiliate has launched Unemployment Lifeline, an online site to rally and organize the unemployed.

Working America is “the biggest organization for the unemployed,” according to spokesman Robert Fox. By the union’s own count, 500,000 of its 3.2 million members are currently jobless, and the group is going door-to-door, recruiting more members from the ranks of the unemployed.

“We spend most of our time demanding the reform of banks, demanding good jobs, and trying to make sure that there’s investment being made in our communities,” says Fox. But come this fall, “We’re going to be engaging our members fully, making sure they’re aware of which candidates to support.”

“We have the ability to make sure a lot of unemployed folks know where politicians stand, who is voting against making investments in jobs, who needs to hear from unemployed workers and who needs to hear from them twice,” he says.

So, who is correct? Will the new fervor bubbling up below the pundits’ radar alter the accepted narrative being spun by Washington? I’m not going to predict.

But I know what outcome I’m rooting for.

More evidence on big banks’ greed

A special master appointed by the Obama administration says 17 banks handed out “excess compensation” at a time they were receiving bailout money to keep their firms afloat. Translation: Taxpayer money paid executives at failing firms for their failures. Beautiful.

NJ’s economic funk

Gov. Chris Christie was elected promising a rebirth of the state’s economy, a promise it was clear he couldn’t keep given the structural changes that have helped to gut the state’s private-sector workforce over the last couple of decades.

According to the Federal Reserve, “a slow jobs recovery and a shrinking manufacturing sector mean the Garden State, which entered the recession six months before the rest of the nation in June 2007, could also be one of the last to emerge.”

“Economic conditions in New Jersey remain essentially flat,” William Dudley, the Fed’s president and CEO, said during a quarterly press briefing on New York, New Jersey and Puerto Rico. “Although activity there is no longer declining, New Jersey has yet to establish a sustained recovery.”

Dudley cited several key issues facing the state — consolidation in the pharmacutical industry and a dying manufacturing sector — that will make it difficult for New Jersey to rebound. What he did not say was that the state was particularly hard hit by the Wall Street crisis, which dried up credit and stalled the housing boom here and also resulted in a chunk of jobs being eliminated both in Hudson County, where financial firms had started settling following 9/11, and in Manhattan, which affected New Jersey commuters.

The governor has blamed the state’s faltering economy on high taxes and red tape, but it is not all clear that tax reform and deregulation will keep companies in New Jersey or attract new ones — especially if services and infrastructure in the state continue to decline.

In the past, the state could point with pride to its roads, but over the last decade-plus, they have fallen into disrepair, as have the state’s bridges and rail network. Schools remain our jewel, at least those in the suburbs, but the assault by the governor on teachers and the uncalled for cuts in state aid for education are likely to create a downward death spiral there, as well.

Fed economists added another factor to the state’s economic woes: “weak job growth in the public sector” (i.e., police officers, teachers, environmental regulators, etc.). Gov. Jon Corzine cut 7,000 jobs from the state payrolls; Gov. Christie has doubled down on that, and is pushing through reforms that have forced and will continue to force local governments to slash jobs, as well.

Reducing the number of public employees may make over-taxed residents happy and could have some short-term fiscal impacts (i.e., balancing local budgets), but it does nothing to aid in the state’s economic recovery. Adding thousands of formerly employed people to the unemployment rolls means that there will be less money being spent by New Jerseyans on consumer goods and services, ultimately spreaading the economic pain beyond that felt by ex-teachers and firefighters.

This is not Christie’s fault and, in many ways, it is not Corzine’s fault either. We have been undergoing an economic restructuring for years that was hidden from view by stock-market and housing bubbles, regulatory changes and a belief that we could live on our credit cards without consequence. As this was happening, governors and legislators of both parties ignored the consequences of their own profligacy, kept spending like drunken sailors and used an assortment of accounting tricks to avoid asking taxpayers to pay the bill that was being rung up.

Now that the bill has come due, we find out we are broke and have no prospect of raising the needed cash to make the payments.

If New Jersey was a household, the bank would be foreclosing.

The way Washington works

Everyone should read Christopher Hayes’ piece at The Nation. The deficit, he points out, has grown from three economic facts: our two unnecessary wars, thge Bush tax cuts and the recession. End the first and let the second expire and we’re long on the way to addressing the debt and deficit crisi.

That said, Hayes makes it clear that we are working against a dangerous rhetorical tide:

The conversation—if it can be called that—about deficits recalls the national conversation about war in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. From one day to the next, what was once accepted by the establishment as tolerable—Saddam Hussein—became intolerable, a crisis of such pressing urgency that “serious people” were required to present their ideas about how to deal with it. Once the burden of proof shifted from those who favored war to those who opposed it, the argument was lost.

We are poised on the same tipping point with regard to the debt. Amid official unemployment of 9.5 percent and a global contraction, we shouldn’t even be talking about deficits in the short run. Yet these days, entrance into the club of the “serious” requires not a plan for reducing unemployment but a plan to do battle with the invisible and as yet unmaterialized international bond traders preparing an attack on the dollar.

What Hayes is describing is the way of Washington, the way that the conventional wisdom dictates all narratives and pushes inconvenient facts out.