Tag: debates

I missed the debate — got hom late from work and, well, it just didn’t interest me. But as my last couple of posts show, I’ve been watching some of the post-debate coverge. My sense from the handful of clips I’ve seen — and the few minutes at the end that I did manage to catch — is that I didn’t miss anything.

There are three front-running candidates, with maybe Bill Richardson hangign around the endges and two longshots with aggressively antiwar views (yes, I like Dennis Kucinich best, though I am also a realist and just don’t see him going anywhere).

So it comes down to two candidates for me: Barack Obama and John Edwards. I don’t have the sense that a debate that takes place a full 10 months before I’d have a chance to vote in the primary (it’s the only reason that I, a committed independent, remain registered as a Democrat) will help me decide.

Right now, I rank my own preferences this way:

• Kucinich — against hte war, skeptical of military engagement in general, extremely liberal on other issues
• Edwards — the two Americas
• Obama — he speaks of hope without pandering

It gets a little more difficult from here. I think I like Richardson and Dodd next, though I can’t pinpoint why, and I don’t like Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, though I think he is correct in his assessment that committing to a unified Iraq — a nation that was cobbled together by the British in the early part of the century when the major powers carved up the remnants of the Ottoman Empire — is almost delusional. the natural divisions are going to win out in the end, I think, though I think his suggested partition — given the mass relocations it would require can only further enflame things.

I’d rather watch Baseball Tonight and read the paper tomorrow (or tonight).

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.