Listen to the Lady

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=showbiz/2010/09/21/bts.gaga.short.dadt.wcsh
Yes, I like her music, but I like her willingness to put her record sales on the line by making a public stand on gay rights. Bravo.

Of course, LG Granderson is right — Ga Ga’s stand likely will mean nothing because supporters of repeal of DADT (and expansion of other gay rights) in the Senate have not been willing to make their voice heard as loudly.

This has, in the end, given so-called moderates like Sens. Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Scott Brown — along with conservative Democrats like Jim Webb — an out (pun intended).

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. it can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Using procedure to oppose procedure: Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t vote?

I just want to understand this: Susan Collins plans to vote against sending the Defense Authorization bill — and the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell — to the full Senate because she dislikes the procedural manuevering by Democrats. I’d be more inclined to agree with her criticism were she not as guilty as anyone in the Senate of using procedural manuevers to get what she wants.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. it can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

Best that we could do?

I understand political realities. But I also demand fairness.

So the slow, painful repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” that is making its way through Congress as we speak has to be classified as a small victory for human rights.

And yet, it is far too slow, bowing toward a notion of “realism” and “pragmatism” that allows fear to trump fairness for gay and lesbian soldiers, granting the homophobes in the military far too much leeway.

On a related but separate note, the DADT battle makes me a bit uncomfortable, because of the inherent contradition: I oppose militarism and the expansion of the military, tend toward pacificism and loathe the strain i our culture that glorifies the soldier and the warrior ethos, while also realizing that the military can play a normalizing role in society, as it did for African Americans when the military was finally desegregated under Truman.

As things stand now, gays and lesbians are not considered equal citizens because they are prohibited from serving openly in an institution whose members many view (unfortunately) as demonstrating the absolute height of citizenship. The repeal of DADT will make it more difficult for the neanderthals and homophobe to continue to insist that gays and lesbians must be treated differently. The edifice of discrimination — the marriage ban and all that comes with it, the lack of antidiscrimination statutes covering the LGBT community in too many states and the general aversion too many still feel toward LGBT people — becomes weaker once DADT is a thing of the past.

So slow, deliberat progress is not a bad thing, but the LGBT community — and those of us who support its cause — need to push hard to make sure the progress is consistetnt and begins to pick up steam. We should not be satisfied until there are no distinctions, until each American — hell, every human being — has the same rights and privileges and can live the lives each of us choose to live without interference from our neighbors.