Borrowing to pay down the debt


This is a lot to take in. The governor is proposing borrowing enough money to cover paying down a large portion of the state’s debt, but also to replenish the state’s Transportation Trust fund and maintain the state’s toll roads for years to come.

Gov. Jon Corzine is billing his toll road proposal as a way to bail out a state awash in debt, a state with a political class that has relied on a host of gimmicks and accounting tricks to spend like drunken sailors while pushing off the consequences for another time.

That time is now. Debt payments are consuming a greater portion of the state’s budget every year. In addition, the state’s pension and healthcare funds are woefully underfunded. Together, these obligations are crowding out other priorities — including real property tax and educational funding reform.

Yes, the Legislature did provide some nominal tax relief this past fall. And yes, it approved on Monday a new school funding formula that calls for a $500 million boost in overall state spending on schools.

The reality, however, is that both of these accomplishments were nothing more than nibbling — a much larger infusion of state cash into local school is needed both to ensure equality of educational opportunity and to reduce the amount spent locally in property taxes. And this does not take into account the cash needed to build the affordable housing units needed both to provide housing and to desegregate this horribly segregated state.

Will the toll-road plan address these issues? Perhaps. The governor certainly seems to think so.

In a speech that may be the most important of his political career, Corzine described his plan as “comprehensive and sober,” adding that is bound to be “controversial.” He ticked off its four elements, some of which Republicans have been demanding for years.

“One: Freeze spending now,” Corzine said. “Two: Limit future spending to revenue growth. Three: Capture the enterprise value of our tollways to pay down debt and make capital investments. Four: Limit borrowing by requiring voter authorization.”

“If there is a better plan, I am open to its consideration,” he said. “Put it on the table.”

According to The New York Times, the governor wants to boost highway tolls over the next 15 years (by 50 percent in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022), while borrowing between $30 billion and $38 billion “to help the state pay off half of its debt and pay for transportation improvements.” The plan also calls for the state to “establish two new agencies, one to operate and maintain the roads, and the other to provide some oversight.”

It is an ambitious plan, that’s not in question; there is no way to address years of political timidity without being bold and ambitious.

What is questionable is whether this plan is the right plan to address the state’s woes. That’s a question I can’t answer at the moment.

My initial sense, however, is that this is just another in a long line of gimmicks foisted on taxpayers — though there is a twist: Taxpayers will not be the ones on the hook for the plan; drivers, the majority of whom the governor says come from out of state, will be. That, in the end, is his chief selling point.

At least the governor is being honest. Unlike his predecessors, who revalued the state’s pension plan so that they could avoid making payments into the fund (I’m talking to you, Christie Whitman and Jim McGreevey), Gov. Corzine is being honest about this plan and the pain, about its risky nature and about the pain it will cause for drivers.

I’m skeptical, but will keep an open mind. It’s now up to the governor, in his upcoming statewide dog-and-pony show, to convince voters and state legislators that his plan offers far more good than ill.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

A vote to delay?

As of now, it appears that the governor’s school-funding plan is not going to pass in the state Senate. This is not a bad thing — and not because the plan is flawed. It is because the plan is being rushed, because officials from school districts like South Brunswick, which appear to gain new funding, are concerned what will happen down the line. And because the concerns of urban educators need to be addressed — will this plan result in reduced funding?

Should the plan go down, I am hoping the governor will put it back on the table and the state Legislature slows the process down and answer the questions.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Death penalty: Now, it’s up to Corzine

The Assembly has followed the state Senate and voted to kill the death penalty. The governor has promised to sign this legislation by sometime next week. New Jersey feels a little more humane today than it did yesterday.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Questionable financing for stadium

Charles Stile in The Record puts into words the uneasy feeling I felt about the private fundraising effort announced by Gov. Jon Corzine and state Sen. Ray Lesniak to make the Rutgers football stadium expansion a reality.

The governor was right to strip the project of state funding, given the sorry state of New Jersey’s finances. But his basic character flaw — a need to make everyone happy — has resulted in a flawed approach to the funding the project.

There are several problems.

First, as Stile points out, the Corzine/Lesniak plan creates the potential for influence peddling.

Alumni, students and small businesses are likely contributors. But if those donations are classified as confidential, charitable contributions, what’s to stop, say, auto insurance carriers, utilities, casinos and other state-regulated industries from pumping piles of campaign cash toward the cause?

What about developers, facing trouble with wetlands applications at the Department of Environmental Protection? And how about all those contractors barred from making political contributions by the state’s pay-to-play bans? Here’s a chance to give without fear of penalty — or public disclosure.

In essence, the stadium campaign has the potentail to drill massive holes in efforts to break the grip that campaign donors have on the legislative process. Pay-to-play restrictions, public financing, lobbying disclosure, all go out the window if the same people who are prohibited from contributing to the governor or a senate campaign or who are limited can then give for one of Gov. Corzine or Sen. Lesniak’s pet projects.

The second issue I have with the expansion and the fundraising is that the money could be used to bring back some other, smaller sports or to fund academics. The desire on the part of Rutgers — my alma mater — to be a bigtime football program is understandable.

But Rutgers’ mission is not and should not be to field a great football team. Its mission should be to provide a great learning environment for its students and to expand college opportunities for as many New Jersey residents who want to attend and have the grades and test scores to get in. That would mean finding way to reduce tuition for all, or at least subisidize it to a greater degree for most.

The Scarlet Knights’ mediocre 2007 season should be a reminder that football success is fleeting. The school’s reputation as a quality university should not be.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.