The scandal is business-as-usual

Peter Scheer gets the absurdity of the Anthony Weiner scandal right — Weiner was arrogant and probably should have resigned, but what he did is nothing compared to the ongoing and too-often legal corruption we witness from Congress, the White House and the state houses and legislatures.

Weiner (along with former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer) had been strong progressive voices, aggressive in their defense of workers’ rights, consumer rights and the like, but they both got caught with their pants’ down and paid what I think was an appropriate cost.

Charles Rangel, however, remains in office despite his well-publicized financial shenanigans. Bush and Cheney avoided impeachment despite the various illegalities engaged in by their administration. And the list goes on.

Business as usual in Washington is the real scandal.

In the end, we have to ask ourselves what’s worse — Weiner’s tweets or a presidential administration’s illegal spying. I know the answer. Too bad, the press corps seems not to.

  • Send me an e-mail.
  • Read poetry at The Subterranean.
  • Certainties and Uncertainties a chapbook by Hank Kalet, will be published in November by Finishing Line Press. It can be ordered here.
  • Suburban Pastoral, a chapbook by Hank Kalet, available here.

The culture of corruption strikes New Jersey again

The culture of corruption was on full display today as federal investigators announced indictments of 44 people in New York and New Jersey on bribery and money-laundering charges — a perp-walk that featured three New Jersey mayors and two state Assembly members.

The politicians are accused of taking bribes. And five rabbis are accused of laundering it through their non-profit religious institutions, while keeping a cut for themselves. One Brooklyn man, who was among the 44 charged today, was even accused of trying to broker a $160,000 deal for a kidney transplant.

The story hit like a lightning bolt, sending shockwaves through a state political culture one might assume had become inured to charges of corruption and malfeasance.

But the sheer size of the sting — considered a record — makes it difficult to fathom, especially coming in the wake of the conviction of several high-profile New Jersey pols. I would have assumed that the fate of powerbrokers like John Lynch (former New Brunswick mayor and state Senate president), Sharpe James (former Newark mayor and state senator) and Wayne Bryant (former head of the Senate Budget Committee) would have left other pols a bit gunshy when it came to bad behavior.

But I guess one should not assume anything.

The fallout so far has included the resignation of Joseph Doria, state commissioner of community affairs, and calls by members of both parties for the resignation of those now under indictment.

It’s been a rare show of bipartisanship — bipartisan revulsion? — that I suspect will fade in the coming days as the Republicans attempt to make political hay out of the indictments and Democrats respond.

But I think FBI Special Agent in Charge Weysan Dun summed up the reality of what we face here — the nonpartisan nature of corruption:

“The fact that we arrested a number of rabbis this morning does not make this a religiously motivated case. Nor does the fact that we arrested political figures make this a politically motivated case,” Dun said. “This case is not about politics. It is certainly not about religion. It is about crime and corruption. It is about arrogance, and it is about a shocking betrayal of the public trust. It is about criminals who used politics and religion to engage in criminal activities and enrich themselves while betraying those who trusted them.”

One would hope that today’s arrests lead to a renewed effort to tighten ethics rules and strengthen penalties in corruption cases. With each public official under indictment, the fog of suspicion grows, trust weakens and the work of government — the public’s work — becomes that much more difficult to accomplish.

Strange logic on James

Bob Braun tries to make the case that Sharpe James’ transgressions — the use of his office to enrich himself and a mistress — constitute a victimless crime and, because of that, he should not have been subject to federal prosecution.

And it’s true that no one in particular was hurt, but the damage that James’ conduct causes to our democracy — a central point of many of the speeches/essays in Bill Moyers’ new book, Moyers on Democracy — means that James’ abuse of his office has an untold number of victims.

Braun acknowledges this:

Cynicism accumulates when an official is convicted, and it more deeply buries chances for reform. Corruption is a self-fulfilling prophecy — there are victims when the good do nothing.

And, yet, he says, “federal prosecutions should be reserved for crimes that do have victims.”

Violent crimes. The plague of guns transported across state lines. Wretched housing from which some — often out-of-staters — garner profits. Violation of labor and product-safety laws. The big business in illicit drug transportation and sale.

Diverting resources from these crimes creates victims. But they aren’t as much fun to read about.

The crimes he lists, of course, deserve federal focus (consider them the criminal version of interstate commerce) but that does not preclude federal prosecution when a public official is found to have misused his office for private gain.