The budget dance continues

The Assembly Budget Committee has released the newly revised state budget — a spending plan negotiated between the leadership of the two houses of the state Legislature and the governor — but the state Senate panel is not ready to move.

So the dance continues.

It remains likely that a budget will be approved before the July 1 deadline, averting a reprise of the 2006 state government shutdown, but not without some serious battles occurring.

The budget is a mixed bag. While some of the aid to New Jersey hospitals has been restored, money for Muhlenberg in Union County has not and the medical center could still close.

Tax rebates have been cut for higher-income New Jerseyans, as well, and there remains no agreement on how to finance aid for school construction.

So the dance continues.

The dance, of course, and the difficulty of crafting a spending plan that is fair to everyone in the state demonstrates how badly off the tracks the state’s fiscal reform effort has gone. After the 2006 state shutdown, the governor ordered a special joint session of the Legislature that was supposed to craft a plan to alter the way government works and rebuild state finances that were teetering on a cracked and disintegrating fiscal foundation.

Some of the early proposals were amazingly far-reaching — a base-closing-style commission that would look at municipal consolidation and shared services and recommend mergers to the Legislature and governor, who would then have final say; a state comptroller with extensive powers to investigate state and local finances; changes in school financing and administration — but in the end most were either watered down or abandoned.

Other proposals — the governor’s highly questionable plan to leverage Turnpike and Parkway tolls to pay down the state debt — also ran ashore.

So we stand in the same spot as we did two years ago, the poisonous and partisan culture in Trenton making it impossible for the vast majority of the 120 members of the state Legislature to see beyond their own narrow constituencies and the status quo and make the kind of changes that truly could be called reform.

We remain wedded to the outmoded property tax system, convinced that rebates are the only way to lighten the tax burden on homeowners. We refuse to consider an expansion of the state income and corporate taxes or significant revenue sharing as a way to reduce the burden on property taxpayers (raise more from income taxes to pay for education, a state responsibility under the state constitution).

We remain stuck with 566 municipalities in a state of 8 million people, stuck with 611 school districts and another 200 or so taxing districts (county governments, fire districts, etc.) that do little more than create administrative redundancies while doing everything they can to protect their own little fiefdoms.

I’m not arguing that bigger is better — just look at the mess that the cities of Trenton and Newark have become over the years — and it can be legitimately argued that some small towns have the resources and land mass to manage on their own (Cranbury comes to mind).

But towns like Jamesburg, Helmetta and Spotswood, many in Bergen County and along the Jersey Shore, and dozens of others (the two Princetons, the Hopewells and Pennington come to mind) should be looked at seriously to see if merging them either with each other or with another neighbor (Jamesburg into Monroe, for instance, or Hightstown into East Windsor) might result in tax savings, better or expanded services or both. There are 70 municipal governments in Bergen County — an absurd number given the physical size of the county and its population.

We continue to allow legislators to skirt constitutional rules designed to limit their ability to borrow money, which were designed to ensure that borrowing was used only for legitimate longterm expenses (infrastructure improvements, for instance) and not to balance the books.

And we continue to put off our pension and health care obligations waiting for that time bomb to explode.

By we I mean not just the state Legislature and governor but municipal and county officials, school administrators, taxpayers, voters — everyone seeking to protect their own small piece of turf at the expense of the larger public good.

I could continue, but why bother. No one seems to be listening anyway.

GOP offers disingenuous budget response

Three-plus months after Gov. Jon Corzine unveiled his $33 billion budget, the Republican legislative contingent is offering its response.

Too bad the response is as politically motivated as it is flawed.

According to a story in today’s Star-Ledger, the GOP wants to “to restore rebates and pay for big road jobs without toll and gas tax increases” by shifting more than $1 billion in spending from the cities to the suburbs.

The GOP plan would be financed largely by cutting aid to urban school districts and municipalities, as well as targeting state patronage and management jobs, legislative grants and public worker fringe benefits and salaries.

The paper describes the GOP plan this way:

The largest cuts to finance the GOP plan include $157 million from “special municipal aid” and $105 million allotted for the 31 poorest school districts.

They would save another $100 million by eliminating “anticipated pork” for legislative districts, $90 million through more efficient purchasing practices, $85 million by mandating new pension and health insurance givebacks, $69 million in less state subsidies for urban enterprise zones and $68 million by axing patronage and management jobs. The long list includes another $900 million in cuts.

According to a Republican press release, the

plan that identifies $1.32 billion in unnecessary spending in Governor Corzine’s
Fiscal Year 2009 budget proposal and uses it to restore property tax relief and aid to state municipalities, while eliminating the need for gas tax increases to finance transportation needs.

The GOP describes the proposal as both a short-term fix and long-term solution to the state’s annual budget crisis.

“Our primary concern in crafting a state budget should not be the priorities of
Trenton politicians, but those of the taxpayers who are demanding a more affordable New Jersey and a government that is more accountable,” said (Assembly Minority Leader Alex) DeCroce, R-Morris and Passaic. “This proposal is a reprioritization of state spending that provides more tax relief, a strategy to increase the share of pay-as-you-go funding for our state’s transportation program, and more money to reduce the debt burden now facing our children and grandchildren.”

But the key thing to understand about this budget proposal is that the winners would be the suburban constituents of the GOP and the losers would be urban Democrats. This is not to say that the Democrats have not fashioned their budget with this urban suburban split in mind, but it is disingenuous for the Republican leadership to pretend that this is any less political than that of their Democratic colleagues or that it will address the state’s needs in any real way.

One of the most interesting things about the budget plan is that it restores the rebates — something that contradicts the party’s criticisms when the new rebate plan was put into place.

The GOP does offer some structural proposals, but they are the kind that do little more than hamstring government: budget caps and supermajority votes on tax increases.

Some proposals do make sense: placing some borrowing plans on the ballot for voter approval, creating Initiative & Referendum (notice how the GOP always proposes this when it is out of power but then fails to deliver?) and some pension reforms.

But the key to understanding this is the politics. Everything in this state grows from a political agenda and until we can move away from partisanship for the sake of partisanship — which only creates pandering and a one-upping approach to government — and start focusing on the philosphical underpinning of the state’s government, we will not be able to climb out of this morass.

The questions we need to be asking have to do with what the proper level of government services should be and how we pay for it and not which political party will benefit the most.

Reversing course again

The Corzine administration is looking increasingly like a rudderless boat lost at sea. The administration has spent the better part of its three years in control of the state offering controversial proposals and then backing away from them, allowing the state Legislature and the special interests that surround it to fill the vaccuum.

The latest reversal is his decision to restore some of the cuts he proposed in aid to smaller municipalities. While I’ve never viewed the aid cuts as a good idea — using aid as a hammer is unfair; if the governor wants large-scale consolidation he should push the state Legislature to mandate a broad study and then have the Legislature vote on the results — the governor’s willingness to abandon nearly everything he has proposed when faced with political opposition has left him weak and ineffectual.

It is no way to run a state and a waste of the executive’s office — the most powerful executive’s office in the country.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me clicking here.

Windfall to nowhere

The state apparently did better during the third quarter of the current fiscal year than it initially expected, giving it $533 million more in revenue than expected.

The money, however, won’t go very far — much of it is rightly targeted to debt reduction, though the governor wants to shift some to reverse aid cuts to small towns and restore the state Department of Agriculture, both of which are worthy recipients. But there is no mention of restoring aid to hospitals or higher education, both of which seem more important to me.

And, just as significantly, the extra revenue this year is expected to disappear again during the 2008-2009 budget year. As the Ledger writes, state Treasurer David Rousseau

emphasized the state continues to have serious budget problems despite the windfall, which was based on last year’s tax returns when the economy still was thriving. That isn’t the case now, and Rousseau said he expects revenues in the budget year that begins July 1 to be $159 million lower than anticipated.

So, while the windfall is nice, it means little in the long run.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me clicking here.