No more tortured logic

Whatever else one might say about Attorney General-designee Eric Holder, he is not Alberto Gonzales. And that’s a good thing.

As The New York Times reports of today’s confirmation here, Holder responded to a question about the military prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba by unequivocally saying

Waterboarding is torture.” It was so defined under the Spanish Inquisition and when used by the Japanese in World War II, he said, and it remains so today.

President-elect Barack Obama has vowed to close the prison, which Mr. Holder said he agreed with. “There are possibly many other people who are not going to be able to be tried but who nevertheless are dangerous to this country,” he said. “We’re going to have to try to figure out what to do with them.”

Asked whether a president might have the power to immunize people against criminal charges if they employ waterboarding, which creates a drowning-like sensation, to obtain intelligence to use against terrorists, Mr. Holder answered unambiguously: “Mr. Chairman, no one is above the law.”

The answer offers a sharp contrast on the issue, after the last two attorney generals under George W. Bush — Gonzales and Michael Mukasey — who avoided answering the question.

Holder is no shoo-in for confirmation — there is that messy little question about the Marc Rich pardon under Bill Clinton, but Holder’s words are an indication that Obama is serious about changing the nation’s direction and rebuilding America’s moral standing.

Dispatches: A tortured judgmentand an update on Mukasey

Dispatches is up — on the problems with the Mukasey nomination.

And here is an update on the nomination — the Democrats may hold it up pending an answer on the torture question.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Another critic heard from on Mukasey;this time from the right

Saw this on Chris Suellentrop’s Opinionator blog on the New York Times and thought I’d pass along the link. Essentially, we have a conservative (Ron Dreher) who finds significant constitutional issues in Judge Michael Mukasey’s answers to questions on torture and executive power.

I say they shouldn’t vote for him, period. This country cannot afford an attorney general who believes that executive power should be expanded so greatly. I don’t care if the office sits vacant until Bush is out of office. The line has to be drawn by the Senate.

Read my Dispatches column tomorrow for my take (Hint: It is the same as Ron Dreher’s.)

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Just say no, Part 3

This analysis from today’s Times should give Senators voting on the Mukasey nomination pause. This is not about Bush, but about presidential power — I’d ask conservatives to consider whether they are prepared to hand the kind of executive authority they envision for President Bush to a Democrat. I think we all know the answer to that.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.