Runner’s diary, Sunday

Yes, Sunday.

I managed to drag myself out of bed and knock off Three-plus miles. I messed up the GPS and timer at first, so I lost about a half mile and four-plus minutes, but managed a 29-minute 5K on the clock while listening to the vaunted iPod mix.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

Another special session?

Republican Assemblym members Alex DeCroce and Bill Baroni are calling on the governor to call a special session of the state Legislature to force it to enact ethics reform.

According to an Associated Press story, the announcement that state Sen. Wayne Bryant (D-Camden) was indicted on charges of federal corruption, fraud and pension padding spurred the call.

Republicans say reforms should include limiting campaign contributions from government contractors, making it illegal for officials to hold more than one elected office, and outlawing pension-boosting by public officials. Other proposed measures include suspending indicted public officials without pay, requiring jail time for convicted public officials, and turning over control of the Legislature’s ethics committee to private citizens.

The demand is obviously as much about politics as it is about reform, but there is no doubt that a problem exists and that much of the reform package makes sense. A special session, however, may not be the right path, given the ineffectiveness of last summer’s tax session.

The reality is that nothing is going to get done with a major citizen push — especially in an election year when the motivations of elected officials are incredibly suspect.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

No there there

Speculation the other day that Gov. Jon Corzine was the target of a federal probe over the Carla Katz gift fiasco (it was on the Asbury Park Press Web site in the responses to the report that a senior Democrat was about to be indicted) seemed ridiculous to me at the time.

Seems I was right. Read this from The Star-LEdger.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

Do board members forfeittheir free-speech rights?

Paul Mulshine and I, to put it bluntly, come from different universes.

I’m an unreconstructed leftist, a liberal, a progressive — whatever you want to call it. He’s an old-line New Jersey, small-government, libertarian conservative whose logic I find maddening (I’m sure that, were he reading my columns, he’d say the same about me).

And then he writes a column like the one in today’s paper, which takes the state’s School Ethics Commission to task for clamping down on the free speech rights of school board members.

The column caught my eye because of two complaints filed by Monroe resident Jennifer Dressel against a pair of Monroe school board members alleging, in part, that they misrepresented themselves before the public.

As we’ll be writing in tomorrow’s paper, Ms. Dressel is accusing school board President Kathy Kolupanowich and board member Amy Speizer of speaking “separately at parent group meetings without school board approval, while leaving the impression that they represented the board. The complaint also alleges that Ms. Kolupanowich write a letter that implied she was speaking on behalf of the board without board approval and that Ms. Speizer should have
recused herself from matters dealing the board attorney.”

I don’t want to address the specifics of the complaints. It is the process that concerns me, the way in which the ethics rules can be used to quiet board members — whether they be critical of the board or board members defending board actions against critics.

Mulshine describes a Morris County case recently decided by the commission:

The incident began when Harmon, who is a pharmaceutical executive and lives in Long Valley, cast the sole dissenting vote against the school budget last year. His reasoning was that the budget was up 11 percent over the prior year and that this would lead to an increase in property taxes for the hard-working people of the township.

Voting against a budget isn’t illegal — yet. But then Harmon made the mistake of sending a letter to the editor of the local newspaper explaining why he thought voters should oppose the budget.

“The ethics code is just so squishy,” Harmon told me. “Any bozo with a beef can file a complaint against you.”

The bozo in question was a former school board member named Ruth Lisa McCurdy. She also wouldn’t return my call. I suspect these people think speech itself is illegal. In any event, McCurdy filed a complaint under a provision of the school board ethics code that says a member may not “take any private action that may compro mise the board.” She also disagreed with the budget figures in Harmon’s letter.

The commission dismissed the complaint but left intact an advisory opinion that allow board members to write letters as private citizens but to “not hold (themselves) out as a board member.”

Abbott Koloff, writing in the Morristown Daily Record, calls it a “challenge to democracy.”

The point is that school board members are always school board members. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous and to assume that everything that comes out of their mouths, whether it be an opinion on a controversial high school plan, state legislation or the Mets’ pitching staff.

And, in the case of letters to the editor, school board members have no control over how they are identified — our politcy is to always identify board members as board members.

The intent of the rule may have been good — to prevent board member comments from being mistaken as the opinions of the board — but it is overly broad and makes it more likely that board members will just keep quiet. That’s not good for voters, for public policy or democratcy.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here