Runner’s diary, Wednesday

Took yesterday off from running to take the dog to the vet (she is scratching badly, rubbing away her coat and leaving her skin raw). But back to the running today after some light upper-body lifting (I plan to hit the weights more now that what I will call “my race season” has finished — I’m not racing in the dead of winter).

Three miles on the treadmill, playing with my pace (pushed it up to a 7:30 pace for short bursts after starting very slowly) and managed a 25:45 or so (overall, I did 3.3 miles in about 28 minutes).

Music: More Lou Reed.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

The chances for reformin the election’s wake

A bit of a surprise, but not a lot of newspaper commentary today on the election. There were a few, however, worth noting:

Tom Moran in The Star-Ledger outlines how the change in Republican Senate members might alter the party’s relationship to the majority, especially because folks like Bill Baroni and Kevin O’Toole have been pushing the ethics reform issue. The idea — and it makes some sense — is that the GOP might be willing to forgo partisanship and work with the governor on real reforms, with Democrats like John Adler and Barbara Buono then playing maverick to force change.

To see how this might play out, look at the prospects for ethics reform, the albatross around the Democratic Party’s neck.

Democrats tried to release some pressure by enacting weak reforms earlier this year on dual officeholding and campaign finance reform. Gov. Jon Corzine says he wants more, and will push hard for it this year.

As it happens, Republicans agree with him. It’s the Democratic leaders in the Legislature who are blocking the tougher reforms.So look for the new senators to pounce on this in a way the old guard did not. They will offer the governor support, and challenge him to get his own troops in line. They will seek Democratic defections so they can force a floor vote on the reforms, even if Senate President Richard Codey tries to block it. They will hold news conferences and town meetings to push the cause.

“We will use whatever tactics we need to use,” Baroni said. “In this campaign, they stood up and said they want reform. Well, now is the time.”

I hope he’s right. The reforms that were adopted were absurdly weak and there is a lot of difficult work to be done — and not just on ethics.

As Charles Stiles in The Record points out, the Democrats have some advantages that they should use to take some chances and make some real headway on the budget.

The new Democratic majority now has enormous advantages — strong majorities in both houses, which include a new generation of freshman lawmakers. The Democrats also have a governor with strong approval ratings, while New Jersey Republicans are bereft of cash and saddled with George Bush and an unpopular war in Iraq.

Instead of taking a risk-free path to the next election cycle, the Democrats should reconsider their priorities and put forward a progressive, family-oriented agenda — universal health care, a more equitable school funding formula, an energy policy that weighs consumer and environmental concerns with business needs — that could set the stage for Democratic Party control for the next decade. Stop worrying about campaign contributions. They will come.

“We know what the problems are. We know some of the baseline initiatives to be taken,” said former Democratic Gov. Jim Florio. He noted that Corzine has already laid out the foundation of change, with commissions evaluating health care, school funding and energy reform — even though they barely got a mention on the campaign trail.

“Now is the time to deal with them,” Florio said. “I think the Legislature is ready to do it. I think the Legislature will be prepared.”

I would hope so. It is interesting that Stiles quotes Florio — my sense is that the former governor has remained unpopular, but that his stock has grown significantly among people who understand the state’s problems. If the state had followed his plan at the time — not a perfect plan, admittedly — the school funding debate maybe taking a different form and perhaps we wouldn’t be faced with some of the structural problems created by his immediate successors.

The chances of anything real happening, though, depend primarily on Gov. Corzine. If he shows a willingness to go to the mat on ethics and fiscal reform — something he lacked the stomach for during his first two years in office — then we will see major reforms take place. If he continues to play footsie with the traditional Democratic powerbrokers, then all bets are off and he will find himself facing a far tougher re-election fight than he probably should face.

Which brings up another point — one that could also derail reform. Gov. Corzine is up for re-election in 2009 — as are all 80 members of the new Assembly. Election politics have the very real potential to color everything that is to come in the next two years. If it does, change will not occur.

(By the way, my analysis of why the anger and disaffection in the state did not translate to gains for the GOP will be in tomorrow’s South Brunswick Post and Friday’s Cranbury Press.)

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Runner’s diary, Monday — post race edition

Sunday was the third annual Run with the Vikings 5K, a race I’ve now run the last two years. The morning was chilly, but warmed up significantly and the wind was light — a huge change from a year ago when we were brutalized by heavy winds.

In 2006, I ran a 27:40 (8:55) and finished 114th out of 204 runners.

This year, I shaved almost two and a half minutes off my time, finishing at 25:22 (though as these photos show, I was sucking wind at the end), good for 98th place out of 228 runners. Pace: 8:10.

Just as important to me was that I finished 16th among 33 men in my age group (45-49) — an improvement over last year’s 14th-place finish out of 17 men (40-45).

So, overall, a great morning of running.

***

Today, I ran five miles — five tough miles with tight legs — in 44:32 — a 9:53 pace. Music: Lou Reed, NYC Man: Lou Reed The Collection

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Fighting for democracy?

We are in Iraq to promote democracy, right? Isn’t that what President Bush has been saying?

So, what about this maneuver from an erstwhile ally?

Authorities rounded up opposition leaders Sunday after military ruler Gen. Pervez Musharraf suspended Pakistan’s constitution, replaced the chief judge and blacked out independent TV outlets, saying the country must fight rising Islamic extremism.

Musharraf, who seized power in a 1999 coup but had given a conditional pledge to step down as military chief and become a civilian president this year, declared a state of emergency Saturday night, dashing recent hopes of a smooth transition to democracy for the nuclear-armed nation.

“Gen. Musharraf’s second coup,” said the headline in the Dawn daily. “It is martial law,” said the Daily Times.

Across Pakistan, police arrested political activists and lawyers at the forefront of a campaign against military rule.

Among those detained were Javed Hashmi, the acting president of the party of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif; Asma Jehangir, chairman of the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan; and Hamid Gul, former chief of the country’s main intelligence agency and a staunch critic of Musharraf’s support of the U.S.-led war on terror.

“It’s a big blow to the country,” said Gul, as a dozen officers took him away in a police van near the parliament in the capital, Islamabad. Hashmi said the army general would not “not survive the people’s outrage.”

Up to 40 activists were hauled in when police raided the office of the Human Right Commission of Pakistan, including its director, I.A. Rahman, a harsh Musharraf critic, said Mohammed Yousaf, a guard at the office in the eastern city of Lahore.

Musharraf’s leadership is threatened by an Islamic militant movement that has spread from border regions to the capital, the reemergence of political rival and former prime minister Benazir Bhutto and an increasingly defiant Supreme Court, which was expected to rule soon on the validity of his recent presidential election win. Hearings scheduled for next week were postponed, with no new date set.

Juan Cole, the Middle East expert who writes the Informed Comment blog, refers to this as Musharraf’s “coup-within-a-coup.”

Over his eight years of military dictatorship, he had dressed his government up in the outward trappings of ‘democracy.’ He allowed (stage-managed) parliamentary elections in 2002. The same year, he ran for president in a referendum with no opponent, such that he could not lose.

The Supreme Court ruled against him in his attempt to dismiss the uncooperative chief justice, and the same court had been set to rule on whether he could remain as president (he was just reelected to the post by the stage-managed parliament he had helped install).

Musharraf appears to have concluded that the Supreme Court would rule against him, thus his coup-within-a-coup, which at last throws off the tattered facade of democratic institutions and reveals the naked military tyranny underneath. Pitifully, Musharraf explained that he had to make the coup in order to ensure the transition to democracy he says he began 8 years ago. Apparently the “transition” (i.e. Musharraf’s dictatorship) will last for the rest of his life.

As Josh Marshall says in Talking Points Memo, “this is starting to sound a bit more like military dictatorship …”

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.