Random thoughts on the Mets

The Mets remain the team to beat in the NL East, but have inexplicably played like a team waiting to be beaten.

  1. They’ve stopped coming up big in the clutch most nights
  2. The bullpen has been inconsistent
  3. The Carloses have not been the Carloses
  4. There have been an assortment of injuries — some expected, like Moises Alou’s — that have not helped, though they cannot be used as an excuse

The question with the Mets is can they turn it back on and create some distance between themselves and the Phillies (a team that too often finds ways to beat itself) and the Braves (a team that is running on fumes, but still dangerous). I think they can, but they have to reverse the first-half trend and get real production from Delgado and Beltran, consistency from Aaron Heilman and Guillermo Mota, find another pitcher who is ready to contribute and hope that Lastings Milledge is ready.

Yes. Lastings Milledge. I believe that, had he not gone down with the ankle injury shortly after being optioned to New Orleans, he would have been called to the big club and plugged the gap in the outfield.

I still think this team is going to win between 92 and 95 games, which should be enough to win the division. What happens in the playoffs, however, may depend on whether Pedro can be Pedro when he gets back.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

The Yankees just aren’t very good

Perhaps, Allen Barra is the only one who has figured out what plagues the Yankees this year. In short, they are not a very good ball club — aging on the mound where 40 percent of the rotation appears beyond its prime, another pitcher just doesn’t belong and another has no luck; barren at first and at DH; overrated and aging in the outfield; and managed by a man who has been asked to run a team that bears no resemblance to the kind of teams he does well with. In short, the Yankees need to blow things up and start over.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

Pundits are talking to wrong Americans about Libby


Just so we’re clear on this: The pundits believe the American people support the Libby commutation. Isn’t that what I keep hearing the talking heads say?

I mean, this Gallup poll (graphic from Gallup) seems to indicate a general dissatisfaction with the president’s action, if not outright anger.

Exactly which Americans are they talking to? I know: Other pundits.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here

Feeling blue about Rupert

The Audit, the Columbia Journalism Review’s indispensible blog, offers an interview with James Ottaway, that is one of the best pieces on the News Corp. wooing of the Dow Jones board that I’ve come across. (CJR also ran this absolutely terrifying online profile of Murdoch last week that is a must read for anyone interested in the future of The Wall Street Journal and American journalism.)

The Murdoch sale, according to Ottaway, a shreholder who “ran the largely profitable Ottaway unit within Dow Jones, and held various other posts until 2003, and served on the board of directors until last year,” says a News Corp. takeover would result in “more media concentration in the hands the people who use their media power for personal, political, and business interests, as Murdoch does so blatantly with the New York Post, FOX News network, Star TV in China, Phoenix TV in China.”

That, he says, violates the American tradition of journalism.

The American tradition, which I think is a higher standard, produces a higher-quality of journalism. This wasn’t (always the case) from the founding of the country when we had highly partisan press run by political parties and individuals. Jefferson starting a newspaper to attack Adams when they were running for president. We’re a long way from that. But since the Second World War, the principle has been that in your news columns, you report accurately, fairly, as objectively as you can. And on your editorial pages, you can state your personal political—business interests if you want—but generally, American journalism has been to act with a sense of public service in the way you run your newspapers and to consider a newspaper…a public trust, and not just a personal piggybank.

Otherwise, he says, you have “capitalism gone crazy.”

What we’re in danger of losing is fact-based journalism that serves as a basis for public debate. I fear for the country if we do not have unbiased news sources available to every citizen so that they can hear all sides of major public issues and make intelligent decisions when they vote or speak for or against candidates or issues; where the information is based on some agreed-upon factual starting point. Otherwise everything is propaganda and biased information, and nobody knows what the truth is.

And he offers this final thought:

I am saying privately to many of the Bancrofts, and would say publicly: We should not sell Dow Jones and Ottaway Newspapers to Rupert Murdoch. If some of the family members want to sell their Dow Jones shares, let us find a way to buy them out that is not damaging to Dow Jones and its reputation for absolute integrity in reporting and analyzing global business news. Let us find new investors to help us build the company, and not sell it to a company like News Corp, whose core business is entertainment, and whose newspapers are either tabloid fluff or weapons to enhance the business and political interests of Rupert Murdoch.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here