Bad news for a free press

The Seattle Times explains why the FCC was wrong to rewrite ownership rules and why it is important that we put pressure on Congress to reverse Tuesday’s actions. In sum: Consolidation of media shrinks the number of voices, reducing diversity and further marginalizing dissenting views.

Media consolidation is not the remedy to any real or perceived ills that afflict the press. What is needed are laws that encourage an independent press and turn back the consolidation that has occurred during the past 40 years.

The public, Congress and the courts must right the colossal damage wrought by the FCC.

Check out Free Press to see what to do about this.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Email me at grassroots at comcast dot net.

The establishment v. the antiestablishment

Glenn Greenwald’s post today on Salon is worth reading to get a sense as to why the more interesting candidates out there — in particular, John Edwards, Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul — are treated as little more than novelties (in the case of Huckabee and Paul) or nuisances (in the case of Edwards).

(T)here is a clear dichotomy in both the Republican and Democratic fields — one which is a microcosm of our political system generally — of establishment candidates versus anti-establishment candidates. Edwards, Paul and Huckabee are clearly the latter. And that certainly explains a large part of how the media insufficiently covers their campaigns.

By definition, our most influential media outlets are vital parts of the establishment and dependent upon it in countless ways. They perceive attacks on the establishment to be attacks on them. And thus, most journalists are instinctively hostile to candidates which are outside and critical of that establishment. Journalists just don’t believe that the system on which they depend and which gives them their access and purpose can possibly be fundamentally broken or corrupt. They are, after all, the establishment press.

Such outsider candidates begin as the nerdy losers to be held up by our campaign journalists for adolescent, giggly mockery. If their campaigns prosper, they become the target of outright hostility (see, e.g., the media’s role in the destruction of Howard Dean’s candidacy in 2003). In different ways, that has been the arc of media treatment accorded to Paul, Huckabee and Edwards, all of whose candidacies — for better or worse — represent something significant in our political culture, represent direct challenges to prevailing conventional pieties and dominant power centers, and yet (or, rather, therefore) are treated as silly jokes when they are discussed at all.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Email me at grassroots at comcast dot net.

Expanding clean elections

Assembly Speaker Joe Roberts wants to expand the state’s clean election program.

The Camden Democrat called this year’s pilot program a success Tuesday, said the program needed some “refinements” and not a “complete overhaul.”


“The 2007 Clean Elections experience was a vast improvement over the initial 2005 trial of public financing in legislative races,” he said in a press release, in which he outlined three broad changes in the program:

1. Expand the number of Clean Election districts; at a minimum, expand the program to include primary elections in 2009.

2. Strive for parity funding for third-party candidates so they have a more level playing field competing against the major party candidates.

3. Ratchet down spending in designated Clean Election districts as a means of extending public financing to more districts in future elections without requiring exorbitant increases in taxpayer subsidies.

The reforms are the logical next step for a program that helped create a level playing field in the 14th District — even with Common Sense America, an outside group, paying for ads that attacked Democrat Linda Greenstein’s record on taxes.

And leveling the playing field — and expanding opportunities for candidates not tied to the political power structure — is what the program is about.

What was most interesting about Speaker Roberts’ announcement, however, were not the trio of revisions he offered. Those have been on the table for weeks — both Assembly members representing South Brunswick, Bill Baroni, the Hamilton Republican was was just elected to the state Senate, and Linda Greenstein, a Plainsboro Democrat, have said they wanted to see the program expanded and subsidies to candidates reduced.

What is interesting is his interest in potentially expanding the program to local races.

In announcing his principles for improving the program, Roberts also said he is writing a letter to Governor Corzine’s chief of staff, Bradley Abelow, to request that any Clean Elections funds appropriated for the 2007 program remain in the next state budget. Roberts said the funds would be available for potential use in 2008 in the event the program is expanded for local elections – an idea the Speaker plans to examine.

The clean elections program is not perfect and, as the intrusion of Common Sense America shows, special interest cash is unlikely to be removed from the process completely.

But its influence can be reduced by providing candidates with public financing, allowing them to compete electorally without having to rely on corporate or special-interest money.

“The experiences from this year’s three Clean Elections districts prove that the addiction to special interest money can be broken and that voters can become willing participants in meaningful, issue-driven campaigns,” said Roberts.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

E-mail me by clicking here.

Email me at grassroots at comcast dot net.