I have a hdeadache. My achilles hurt. My right hamstring is tight. I overslept. I am full of excuses this morning.
But I did run four miles in 36:14. Not fast, but steady, and it keeps me at a pace for at least 20 for a four-day running week.
Music: Santogold, Santogold
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me clicking here.
This story is from the other day, but it bears mentioning. A bipartisan bill is on the table that would provide full scholarships to in-state public universities, along with housing costs, for any veteran who served at least three years in the armed forces. It also would give vets “15 years to use the benefit, instead of the current 10-year limit, and would set up a new government program that matches financial aid by more expensive private institutions, according to The Washington Post. The program is estimated to cost $51.8 billion over 10 years — not cheap,but the investment would pay significant dividends down the road.
And it’s the right thing to do, regardless of where one stands on the war.
“Meeting the needs of our veterans is a cost of war,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who described the bill as a “thank you” to the troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But there are some — Republicans “and even some members of the more fiscally conservative Democratic rank-and-file” — that are “balking at the cost,” while the military is worried that the legislation would encourage . would soldiers to walk away from the service.
The Pentagon has said that it’s open to boosting college aid, even substantially, for veterans but wants the commitment to extend to at least six years, instead of three, before the full benefit kicks in.
“The last thing we want to do is create a situation in which we are losing our men and women who we have worked so hard to train,” said Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell.
But U.S. Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., one of the sponsors,
counters that his legislation would be more effective in attracting new recruits and would offset any drop in the military’s ranks.
“I can’t think of a better way to broaden (the) propensity to serve than to offer a truly meaningful educational benefit, rather than simply taking that smaller demographic” of those already enlisted “and pound on it” with repeated combat tours, he said.
More importantly, the people we are sending into war deserve more than the stop-loss program and IEDs.
“Visit Walter Reed,” said Marty Conatser, head of the American Legion, in a recent statement urging Congress to pass the bill. “War is expensive indeed and the bulk of that cost is paid for by the men and women who wear the uniform. Benefits are just a small, small cost of war.”
A cost we have a moral responsibility to pay.
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me clicking here.
Put in five miles on the road today in 45:51 — not a great pace, but that’s OK. I could still feel the impact of yesterday’s seven-miler and the bad heel I’m dealing with.
Music: Steve Earle, Washington Square Serenade
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me clicking here.
Paul Krugman points out an interesting fact today and then asks the $64,000 question on his blog:
Do you remember how, after the 2004 election, we had — according to all the talking heads — entered a new era of permanent Republican dominance? At that point the GOP held 232 seats in the House to the Democrats’ 202 — and this was thought of as overwhelming dominance.
After last night’s special election in Miss., the Democrats hold 236 seats to the Republicans’ 199.
Can the Democrats nonetheless find a way to lose the presidential race?
I’m afraid of what the answer might be.
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me clicking here.
The state apparently did better during the third quarter of the current fiscal year than it initially expected, giving it $533 million more in revenue than expected.
The money, however, won’t go very far — much of it is rightly targeted to debt reduction, though the governor wants to shift some to reverse aid cuts to small towns and restore the state Department of Agriculture, both of which are worthy recipients. But there is no mention of restoring aid to hospitals or higher education, both of which seem more important to me.
And, just as significantly, the extra revenue this year is expected to disappear again during the 2008-2009 budget year. As the Ledger writes, state Treasurer David Rousseau
emphasized the state continues to have serious budget problems despite the windfall, which was based on last year’s tax returns when the economy still was thriving. That isn’t the case now, and Rousseau said he expects revenues in the budget year that begins July 1 to be $159 million lower than anticipated.
So, while the windfall is nice, it means little in the long run.
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me clicking here.
