The budget dance continues

The Assembly Budget Committee has released the newly revised state budget — a spending plan negotiated between the leadership of the two houses of the state Legislature and the governor — but the state Senate panel is not ready to move.

So the dance continues.

It remains likely that a budget will be approved before the July 1 deadline, averting a reprise of the 2006 state government shutdown, but not without some serious battles occurring.

The budget is a mixed bag. While some of the aid to New Jersey hospitals has been restored, money for Muhlenberg in Union County has not and the medical center could still close.

Tax rebates have been cut for higher-income New Jerseyans, as well, and there remains no agreement on how to finance aid for school construction.

So the dance continues.

The dance, of course, and the difficulty of crafting a spending plan that is fair to everyone in the state demonstrates how badly off the tracks the state’s fiscal reform effort has gone. After the 2006 state shutdown, the governor ordered a special joint session of the Legislature that was supposed to craft a plan to alter the way government works and rebuild state finances that were teetering on a cracked and disintegrating fiscal foundation.

Some of the early proposals were amazingly far-reaching — a base-closing-style commission that would look at municipal consolidation and shared services and recommend mergers to the Legislature and governor, who would then have final say; a state comptroller with extensive powers to investigate state and local finances; changes in school financing and administration — but in the end most were either watered down or abandoned.

Other proposals — the governor’s highly questionable plan to leverage Turnpike and Parkway tolls to pay down the state debt — also ran ashore.

So we stand in the same spot as we did two years ago, the poisonous and partisan culture in Trenton making it impossible for the vast majority of the 120 members of the state Legislature to see beyond their own narrow constituencies and the status quo and make the kind of changes that truly could be called reform.

We remain wedded to the outmoded property tax system, convinced that rebates are the only way to lighten the tax burden on homeowners. We refuse to consider an expansion of the state income and corporate taxes or significant revenue sharing as a way to reduce the burden on property taxpayers (raise more from income taxes to pay for education, a state responsibility under the state constitution).

We remain stuck with 566 municipalities in a state of 8 million people, stuck with 611 school districts and another 200 or so taxing districts (county governments, fire districts, etc.) that do little more than create administrative redundancies while doing everything they can to protect their own little fiefdoms.

I’m not arguing that bigger is better — just look at the mess that the cities of Trenton and Newark have become over the years — and it can be legitimately argued that some small towns have the resources and land mass to manage on their own (Cranbury comes to mind).

But towns like Jamesburg, Helmetta and Spotswood, many in Bergen County and along the Jersey Shore, and dozens of others (the two Princetons, the Hopewells and Pennington come to mind) should be looked at seriously to see if merging them either with each other or with another neighbor (Jamesburg into Monroe, for instance, or Hightstown into East Windsor) might result in tax savings, better or expanded services or both. There are 70 municipal governments in Bergen County — an absurd number given the physical size of the county and its population.

We continue to allow legislators to skirt constitutional rules designed to limit their ability to borrow money, which were designed to ensure that borrowing was used only for legitimate longterm expenses (infrastructure improvements, for instance) and not to balance the books.

And we continue to put off our pension and health care obligations waiting for that time bomb to explode.

By we I mean not just the state Legislature and governor but municipal and county officials, school administrators, taxpayers, voters — everyone seeking to protect their own small piece of turf at the expense of the larger public good.

I could continue, but why bother. No one seems to be listening anyway.

Battlefield may clinch MOM battle

The state Department of Environmental Protection’s Division of Parks and Forestry has apparently given ” thumbs down to the Monmouth Junction route’s proposed crossing” of the Monmouth Battleground State Park, according to the Asbury Park Press.

A May letter from the division, the paper says,

cites adverse effects from commuter trains on the park — which is crossed by rails where a freight train runs — and from more drivers using Route 522 to reach a proposed station in Manalapan near the park.

The effort to upgrade the Monmouth Junction line across the preserved battlefield could be prevented by federal officials, now that the DEP has rendered an opinion about the effects, a prominent historian said.

“They can’t proceed without the permission of the New Jersey Historic Sites Council, and if they approve, the National Parks Service would not approve,” said Garry Wheeler Stone, Monmouth Battlefield State Park historian.

The Post and Press will have more on this story as it develops.

An oily maneuver

Ah, that John McCain. He’s such an environmentalist. I mean, only someone committed to protecting the environment, to safeguarding our oceans and beaches, would support an end to a federal ban on oil drilling off the coast, right?

In fact, a straight-talking, maverick Republican would be willing to buck his party, even the president, to take such a stand, right?

It couldn’t be that McCain has engaged

in an obvious attempt to pander to voters’ disgust with high gas prices as well as to grease his way with the more conservative Republican base that believes any oil well is a good oil well

as The Star-Ledger points out.

McCain and Bush tout drilling as a cure for high gas prices and dependence on foreign oil. And if it actually were, perhaps even ocean-loving Jerseyans could be seduced into allowing oil rigs offshore. But drilling offers neither short-term nor long-term relief.

But then, this is not about oil prices or the environment. As with his dopey gas-tax holiday idea, this is about votes. The straight-talking McCain and his campaign apparently believe that voters will ignore these facts, as outlined by the Ledger.

End the drilling ban today and it would take at least 10 years for oil to begin flowing. There would be zero effect on gasoline pump prices today and for years in the future.

Moreover, when the oil did begin flowing, there would not be enough of it to meet America’s needs. Federal estimates are that off-coast oil deposits total about 16 billion barrels — an amount equal to only about two years’ worth of estimated national consumption in 2018.

Of course, voters saw through his gas-tax holiday and are likely to see this policy announcement for the empty the pandering it is.

(Check out Jimmy Marulies’ editorial cartoon in The Record today.)

Runner’s diary, Thursday

I wasn’t sure how I felt this morning when I woke up, so I wasn’t sure what kind of run I’d get in. My goal was to do seven, but a minimum of five miles — that would have kept me on a pace to match last week’s total, provided I did four on Friday, as I did last week.

But it was a nice morning, temperatures moderate with a high blue sky, and I started to feel pretty good at about mile two. My pace was moderate to slow — about 9:30 — and I just decided to keep going and see what I had in me.

The result: eight miles in 1:16:40, a 9:35 pace and the longest run I’ve done in quite some time. That puts me at 21 for the week and 413 for the year (I think).

iPod selection was a mix of music (new Mellencamp song, Widespread Panic, Wilco, Springsteen and Elvis Costello) and podcasts (A “Bill Moyer’s Journal” from January and some poetry byYusef Komanyakaa).