Holiday cheer

A quick wish to my readers and readrrs of the Princeton Packet's 11 newspapers: Happy Hanukkah and merry Christmas!

This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service from Verizon Wireless!

To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.

To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime� 6.5 or higher is required. Visit www.apple.com/quicktime/download to download the free player or upgrade your existing QuickTime� Player. Note: During the download process when asked to choose an installation type (Minimum, Recommended or Custom), select Minimum for faster download.

A hand up and a hand out are needed

Though more and more people are struggling in this failing economy — the Crisis Ministry of Princeton and Trenton, for instance, reports that it served 1,400 families in October — there is a core group that had been struggling even when we were experiencing what Wall Street had been painting as good times.

Consider these figures from the Mercer Alliance to End Homelessness:

  • On any given day in Mercer County, over 1200 people experience homelessness. (Homeless Resource Advisory Council, HRAC, COC 2008
  • Homeless survey snapshots from February 2002 through August 2004 by HRAC show 3 relatively consistent numbers of sheltered homeless in Mercer County: See links to recent surveys. (2003 Survey) (2004 Survey)
  • Over the course of a year, more than 3,000 men, women, and children in Mercer County receive services in the homeless system. (Mercer County Homeless Resources Advisory Council (HRAC)
  • Approximately 20% of homeless children do not attend school regularly. (National Center on Family Homelessness)
  • Homeless children are 3 times more likely than other children to have emotional of behavioral problems. (National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty)
  • Homeless children are twice as likely to experience hunger than non-homeless children. (National Center on Family Homelessness)

That’s why a concerted effort to battle homelessness is needed, including income supports and expanded support services, an aggressive effort to build more affordable housing and universal, single-payer healthcare that takes medical bills out of the equation as one of the leading causes of bankruptcy and homelessness.

In the short term, however, legislation that recently passed the state Assembly — A3101 — and awaits a Senate vote could help. The legislation, called the “County Homelessness Trust Fund Act,” would allow the state’s 21 counties to create to

impose a surcharge of $3 on each document recorded with a county, for deposit into a county homelessness trust fund, five per cent of which may be used annually for administrative costs related to the administration of the fund, and the remainder of the monies in the fund may be used solely for the operation of a homelessness housing grant program established in order to provide:

  • for the acquisition,construction, or rehabilitation of housing projects, or units within housing projects, that supply permanent affordable housing for homeless persons or families, including those at risk of homelessness;
  • rental assistance vouchers, including tenant and project based subsidies, for affordable housing projects or units within housing projects that provide permanent affordable housing for homeless persons or families, including those at risk of homelessness;
  • supportive services as may be required by homeless individuals or families in order to obtain or maintain, or both, permanent affordable housing;
    and
  • prevention services for at risk homeless individuals or families so that they can obtain and maintain permanent affordable housing.

Grants awarded by the governing body of the county shall be used to support projects that:

  • measurably reduce homelessness;
  • demonstrate government cost savings over time;
  • employ evidence-based models;
  • can be replicated in other counties;
  • include an outcome measurement component;
  • are consistent with the local homelessness housing plan; or
  • fund the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of projects that will serve homeless individuals or families for a period of at least 30 years or equal to the longest term of affordability required by other funding sources.

The trust funds, according to the NJ Advocacy Network to End Homelessness, would “leverage … scarce funding” and “help thousands of families and individuals in New Jersey move into permanent housing.”

States across the country have helped localities dramatically reduce their homeless populations by enabling them to fund the implementation of local plans to end homelessness through local Trust Funds. In these states, this has resulted in a reduction of costs to the public sector and community. A recent example is the King County Homeless Housing and Services Fund, created when the Washington State
Legislature passed the Homeless Housing and Assistance Act of 2005 (ESSHB 2163) establishing an additional $10 document recording fee dedicated to funding homeless initiatives. This year this assisted more than 200 low-income, homeless individuals and their families will be able to move into stable housing where they can receive the supportive services they need to maintain that housing. The goal of the legislation in
Washington State was to reduce homelessness by 50% in ten years.

The same results can and will happen in New Jersey.

The Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee endorsed the legislation by a 4-0 vote, with one abstention. It now awaits a vote of the full Senate, where it is likely to pass.

In the meantime, do what you can to help out groups like the Crisis Ministry, the Mercer Alliance, Coming Home in Middlesex County and all of the other groups working to aid those in the direst of need.

Will Obama set a new table?

The nation’s agricultural and food policies are stuck in the past — the 19th century, to be exact — and food activists are hoping the new president will change the way the nation eats and farms, bringing the United States into the 21st century.

It remains an open question, however, whether he will.

Although Mr. Obama has proposed changes in the nation’s farm and rural policies and emphasizes the connection between diet and health, there is nothing to indicate he has a special interest in a radical makeover of the way food is grown and sold.

Still, the dream endures. To advocates who have watched scattered calls for changes in food policy gather political and popular momentum, Mr. Obama looks like their kind of president.

Not only does he seem to possess a more-sophisticated palate than some of his recent predecessors, but he will also take office in an age when organic food is mainstream, cooking competitions are among the top-rated TV shows and books calling for an overhaul in the American food system are best sellers.

“People are so interested in a massive change in food and agriculture that they are dining out on hope now. That is like the main ingredient,” said Eddie Gehman Kohan, a blogger from Los Angeles who started Obamafoodorama.com to document just about any conceivable link between Mr. Obama and food, whether it is a debate on agriculture policy or an image of Mr. Obama rendered in tiny cupcakes.

“He is the first president who might actually have eaten organic food, or at least eats out at great restaurants,” Ms. Gehman Kohan said.

Still, no one is sure just how serious Mr. Obama really is about the politics of food. So like mystery buffs studying the book jacket of “The Da Vinci Code,” interested eaters dissect every aspect of his life as it relates to the plate.

The reality, as with everything else surrounding the president-elect, is that progressives may be projecting their own desires onto him, leaving far more room for disappointment than there should be.

The LGBT movement is (rightly) angry over the choice of the Rev. Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. Economic populists — like me — are none too pleased with the economic team he’s assembled, peace activists are angry over his retention of Robert Gates as defense secretary (not to mention their puzzlement over the choice of Hillary Clinton for secretary of state), and so on.

None of this should have been a surprise — as I’ve written and so many on the left have said, Barack Obama is a cautious political centrist, albeit one with progressive instincts that have been lacking among most Democrats in recent years.

I remain hopeful that Obama will move the nation in a more humane and reformist direction, even if he does not take us as far toward social democracy as I would like.

Tenants have rights — even when landlords face foreclosure

This would seem to be common fairness — but then, there are no guarantees that landlords will be fair. So the state public advocate has to remind landlords that they can’t kick their tenants to the curb when they go into foreclosure.

As foreclosures continue to rise across New Jersey, Public Advocate Ronald K. Chen and Banking and Insurance Commissioner Steven M. Goldman said today landlords and others who force tenants out without a legal eviction order face both civil and criminal charges. Likewise, they said, lawyers and real estate agents who try to force tenants out could lose their licenses and face fines.

“We have had reports that tenants are being informed by real estate agents, attorneys, and others acting on behalf of a lender that they must move because their building has been foreclosed upon,” Chen said. “We have already reached out to several of these organizations and individuals to put them on notice that their actions are illegal.”

Of the 50,000 foreclosures anticipated in New Jersey this year, between 20,000 to 23,000 tenants are affected, said Matt Shapiro, executive director of the New Jersey Tenants Organization.

Chen and Goldman are fighting back by targeting letters from landlords, real estate firms and lawyers telling tenants they must vacate their apartments because of a foreclosure or offering “cash for keys.”

Tenants should not be intimidated. And if they feel they are being intimidated they should call the New Jersey Tenants Organization.

Money for nothing?

The numbers wouldn’t be quite so shocking — $180 million over eight years — had the Yankees not already written some big checks in recent weeks.

Mark Teixeira is reported to have signed the latest big-money deal with Hank and Hal Steinbrenner, bringing to about $425 the amount spent by the Bronx Bombers on three players this off season alone. And this doesn’t take into account the $300 million deal Alex Rodriguez signed a year ago, or the millions upon millions owed to Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera.

As ESPN points out,

Teixeira’s salary gives the Yankees, who are preparing to move into their $1.3 billion new ballpark in April, the four highest-paid players in Major League Baseball, including third baseman Alex Rodriguez, shortstop Derek Jeter and Sabathia.

Teixeira’s agreement also comes just one day after the Yankees received a $26.9 million luxury tax bill for 2008, when their streak of 13 consecutive playoff appearances ended. But with the revenue from their new stadium, where tickets are priced at up to $2,500 per game, their appetite for free agents wasn’t diminished.

It’s truly mind boggling to think how much money the franchise has tied up in a handful of players, but then these are some pretty good players.

Consider that the infield boasts four all-stars — two of whom are essentially automatic first-ballot Hall-of-Famers. They also have the games all-time greatest closer.

At the same time, this is a team with three huge questions hanging over it:

  • Starting pitching after CC Sabathia includes a pitcher coming off a major injury (Wang), a pitcher with a history of injuries and only pitching well in his walk year (Burnett) and a kid or two.
  • The outfield is either old (Matsui and Damon), coming off a career year (Nady) or just not worth much (Swisher and Cabrera).
  • Robinson Cano has shown a troubling tendency to coast.

So, we’ll see if this spending spree has the desired effect. It has been eight years since the Yankees won the World Series and five since they made it to the series. As things stand right now, I don’t know if they even can be considered the favorite to win the pennant.

But then, I’ve never been a fan of the pinstripers.