Victory on campaign finance for the good guys

The state Supreme Court has endorsed the state’s pay-to-play ban — and now needs to turn its attention to local bans seeking to accomplish the same thing.

The court in a unanimous decision Thursday affirmed an appellate court ruling that found that

the State’s interest in insulating the negotiation and award of State contracts from political contributions that pose the risk of improper influence, purchase of access, or the appearance thereof, is a sufficiently important interest to justify a limitation on political contributions. The panel further found that the $300 limitation on contributions to gubernatorial candidates and political committees by businesses and principals of businesses who enter into substantial State contracts constitutes a “means” of protecting this interest that is “closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgement of association freedoms.”

In particular, it is important that the state — whether it be the judiciary or the Legislature — step in and expand it to municipalities. The courts had nixed a portion of Monroe’s pay-to-play rules earlier this year — those governing money contributed by land developers — forcing the town to rewrite its ordinance. That was unfortunate and needs to be changed — as campaign finance reformers point out.

Harry Pozycki, chairman of the Citizens’ Campaign Legal Task Force that helped draft the campaign-finance law, applauded the Supreme Court decision and said the law’s reach should be expanded to all levels of government.

“Now that the Supreme Court has spoken so decisively, it’s time to quickly expand the approach used at the state level to county and municipal government,” he said.

State Sen. Bill Baroni (R-Mercer) also called for a statewide ban.

“We must finally clean up New Jersey’s culture of corruption and restore
New Jerseyans’ faith and trust in their government,” he said.

It’s difficult to argue with that.

Memories and uncertainties: Thoughts on the death of a classmate

Yesterday’s wine, we’re yesterday’s wine
Aging with time, like yesterday’s wine
— Willie Nelson

I’d heard about the accident early on Monday, a seven-car pile-up on Route 78 that had left two women dead. I saw some of the videos — the terrible wreckage was sobering — but did nothing with the news. It didn’t appear to have a local connection and I had to worry about the communities our newspapers covered.

That changed later that night when my wife Annie received a call from her friend Nicki. One of the drivers had graduated with us.

Janet Ilnicki had been prom queen and homecoming queen, an incredibly popular girl at South Brunswick High School. I knew her, like I knew most of our class. Back in the late 1970s, there was probably 1,100 students at the high school (compared with current graduating classes of 700), so we all knew each other on some level.

I was friendlier with her during freshman and sophomore years than I was during our final two years at the high school. We travelled in different circles, had different friends, though we shared some of the same classes.

And yet, the news of the accident and her death struck a chord. I know it struck a chord with many others from our graduating class — about 30 or so of us have been communicating via a running thread on Facebook. Some of the writers had been good friends with Janet in high school; others were like me. All of us had nothing but good things to say about her.

I remember when I heard the news about another classmate, Mukul Agarwala, who died on 9/11. He had started at his new job in the towers that Monday. I was friends with him — pretty good friends, in fact — for a number of years, but lost touch after high school. Seeing his face on my computer screen was eerie and sad and reminded me that things are so fragile.

Janet’s death struck me the same way. The circumstances of her death could be described as the definition of an accident — as one of her father’s neighbors told me in an e-mail — one coincidence piling on top of another so that she was in the wrong place at exactly the wrong time.

Ms. Adamko spent Sunday with her family in South Brunswick commemorating the 10-year anniversary of her sister’s death. Ms. Adamko left early Monday and was killed in a seven-car pileup around 10:42 a.m. near Exit 49A on Route 78.

State police said the accident began after a dump truck, which was in the westbound express lane, crossed into the eastbound lane and turned over. The dump truck struck a tractor-trailer, which then jackknifed, and five passenger vehicles were caught in the accident as the dump truck spilled rock and dirt across the interstate, according to state police spokesman Stephen Jones.

Basically, it could have been any of us.

As with Mukul’s death, the news spread quickly through a high school community that splintered into memory within months after graduation. We were a cliquish class, not particularly unified, a fact highlighted by the fragmented nature of the two reunions I’ve attended (and by our inability, generally, to plan them). I’ve kept in touch with a handful of close friends, see a few others who I was friends with in high school and have wondered about a number of others. But I have not had an overriding desire to recreate my high school years (God forbid).

I think part of what I am feeling is tied to my growing older. I am 46 and the death of someone I’d known when I was younger, someone who was the same age as me and came from the same place, really underscores the fragility of things, highlights the reality that our time here is quite fleeting. That is something I understood intellectually when I was 16, but not emotionally.

At 16 — or 20 or even 25 — there is that sense that one is invincible, that there is an entire world open for us. By 46, our expectations have changed and we look at the world through very different eyes.

I can see that uncertainties are the only certain thing in this world — I guess you could say that it is my foundational belief, the idea that allows me to make sense of a world that often seems so chaotic and out of control. Death frames so much of our lives — my father-in-law, a brother-in-law, a cousin, a close friend, a couple of classmates, co-workers and the harsh news that runs across the TV screen daily.

And we move on, keep going, enjoy the highs — watching our new dogs play with a toy together, for instance, or taking my nephews to the Pennsylvania Dutch market on Route 27 — and huddle together in response to the lows.

Here is a poem I wrote back in probably 2002 or 2003 (published in Big Hammer a few years ago). I guess it is my 9/11 poem, but I think it is apt as I stare out the window of my office on Witherspoon Street in Princeton, the sun shining on the wet macadam:

CERTAINTIES AND UNCERTAINTIES
(After Attila Jozsef, “To Sit, To Stand, To Kill, To Die”)

To drag this rake across wet leaves,
to scrub the crud from the bottom of this pan,
to wake as sunlight breaks through the gap in the shades,
to worry that all this could burn out, break,
all in the blink of an eye,
to pray that it won’t, that this can continue,
that these loves, this life can live on,
to wait for the telephone’s electronic ring,
to wander in the vast tundra of the mind,
to catch lighting bugs in jars,
to stare in disbelief as jets crash
and the towers crumble,
to know the calendar pages still turn,
to wander the curves of your hips
and the crevices of your soul,
to capture your queen and move on your king,
to reboot your computer after it’s crashed,
to answer nasty e-mails
or just delete them unread,
to forget,
to crest upon you like a wave in your mind,
to leave and never return,
to only know the moment
and guess the future,
to look these uncertainties in the eye
and laugh or cry but
always to keep it going, to get along
in this, this uncertain world of ours.

No more tortured logic

Whatever else one might say about Attorney General-designee Eric Holder, he is not Alberto Gonzales. And that’s a good thing.

As The New York Times reports of today’s confirmation here, Holder responded to a question about the military prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba by unequivocally saying

Waterboarding is torture.” It was so defined under the Spanish Inquisition and when used by the Japanese in World War II, he said, and it remains so today.

President-elect Barack Obama has vowed to close the prison, which Mr. Holder said he agreed with. “There are possibly many other people who are not going to be able to be tried but who nevertheless are dangerous to this country,” he said. “We’re going to have to try to figure out what to do with them.”

Asked whether a president might have the power to immunize people against criminal charges if they employ waterboarding, which creates a drowning-like sensation, to obtain intelligence to use against terrorists, Mr. Holder answered unambiguously: “Mr. Chairman, no one is above the law.”

The answer offers a sharp contrast on the issue, after the last two attorney generals under George W. Bush — Gonzales and Michael Mukasey — who avoided answering the question.

Holder is no shoo-in for confirmation — there is that messy little question about the Marc Rich pardon under Bill Clinton, but Holder’s words are an indication that Obama is serious about changing the nation’s direction and rebuilding America’s moral standing.

The news is still bad

The governor, during his third state of the state address, continued what has been a long litany of dire pronouncements that in the end amount to nothing. Only this time, he attempted to borrow a page from President-elect Barack Obama and recast the bad news through a hopeful lens.
New Jerseyans’ “determination remains strong,” their “drive is undiminished” and “work ethic knows no bounds” — which will aid the state in digging itself out of its mess.
The problem is that New Jersey is not hurting because of the recession, though the national economy has not made matters any better.
The reality, as the governor has been saying since he first took office, is that the state has been making too many bad fiscal choices over the years, avoiding the difficult decisions and shifting money from one pocket to another and calling it income. That allowed it to avoid painful budgetary decisions — until the 2006 budget standoff led to a government shutdown. Since then, state government has been a bit more honest about what it faces, though it has remained unable to do what needs to be done to change the way we spend and raise money.
The national economy has made these problems worse, by eroding state revenues at a time when the state needs to spend added money on its social safety net and on infrastructure projects that would generate jobs. In the past, the state would borrow money to plug the gap, but the governor is proposing a belt-tightening that may address some of the long-term budget problems but lead to added pain now.
The governor admits this.

By the close of the calendar year, the deepening recession had required us to cut spending by another $800 million. That’s a total of $1.4 billion in cuts in this fiscal year alone.Let me repeat — $1.4 billion …… not in the rate of growth, but in absolute dollars.

It’s been painful, and we’ve had to make many ugly choices. But together with my partners in the Legislature, we are making the hard choices.

The question remains, however, whether they are making the right choices. The governor announced likely cuts in state aid to towns while making it clear that they will not be able to raise taxes to offset the cuts. That will just force the pain downward, making them slash their services.
In the end, Jon Shure, president of the liberal New Jersey Policy Perspective, hit it right in his comments to The New York Times, giving the speech “mixed marks” and saying “he would have liked to hear more concrete plans, rather than a campaign-style list of greatest hits.”

“The ratio between the accomplishments of the past and proposals for the future was far more in favor of the past, especially compared to his past speeches,” he said. “So it lacked a coherent vision of what we want the state to be.”