UPDATED: Losing count, but winning on marriage equality

A federal judge overturned Indiana’s same-sex marriage ban yesterday, while an appeals court did the same in Utah today — part of a tidal wave of decisions that show that momentum is on the side of equality.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard L. Young ruled that there was little difference between a so-called gay marriage and a heterosexual one and that treating couples differently based on orientation was unconstitutional.

“It is clear that the fundamental right to marry shall not be deprived to some individuals based solely on the person they choose to love,” Young ruled. “In time, Americans will look at the marriage of couples such as Plaintiffs, and refer to it simply as a marriage – not a same-sex marriage. These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitution demands that we treat them as such.”

The decision follows rulings in other Republican-led states that have been hostile to gay rights and brings the number of states that have either legally enshrined marriage equality or had their bans overturned to — well, I’ve lost count. And that is the point. What started as a steady trickle of pro-equality rulings and votes in the wake of Prop. 8 in California, which was probably the last major victory for the so-called marriage-protection side, has turned into a full-on wave that has washed over not only blue states like New York and Massachusetts, but red states like Utah, Kentucky and, now, Indiana.

Does this mean the battle is won? No. But momentum is in the right direction.

Send me an e-mail.

Now entering the game for the Sixers, Benjamin Franklin

Deadspin offers this report on the Sixers’ decision not to use what it calls “Ballin’ Ben Franklin” as an alternate logo — based on this tweet:

Bad move, as the Deadspin post makes clear:

I usually dislike secondary logos, as they aren’t much more than an excuse for the team to double dip on merchandise sales, but I am 100 percent in the tank for this logo. Look at how hard Ben Franklin is balling! I imagine he’s splitting a double team at the top of the key, using that right hand for a LeBron-style push off (no ref is gonna call that foul on Ben Franklin, man) before crashing his way to the rim for the hoop and the foul.

For the sake of the fans, the Sixers should reconsider their decision not to use Ballin’ Ben Franklin. This team is probably going to select seven feet worth of damaged goods with the third pick in the draft later this month, and then fans are going to spend yet another season watch crap basketball while waiting for the potential savior to get healthy. You know what would make a season like that easier to endure? Ballin’ Ben Franklin.

Plus, there is some history. Pictured is a bobblehead I won at the Jersey Shore in the summer of 2002, after the NBA All-Star game was played in Philadelphia. Notice the resemblance?

Tip of the hat to Larry Hirsch for alerting me to the new. He suggests George Washington suit up for the Wizards. My question is this: What historical figure should be reborn in alternate logo form?

Send me an e-mail.

When anti-Semitism undercuts a good fight

This article from something called the American Free Press was posted over the weekend to a Facebook page for Tent City in Lakewood, the homeless encampment which I’ve been writing about for two years.

The article purports to uncover the truth about the township, but it cloaks some basic accuracies — the town is run by an insular community, engages in questionable low-income housing allotments and has used aggressive tactics to root out the homeless — in anti-Semitiic language and rhetoric that I find shocking.

Starting with its headline referencing “the final solution,” and including gratuitous stabs at Jewish names, a discussion of birth rates and a not-so-subtle comparison between the 12th-generation minister who founded the tent encampment and the immigrant orthodox community, the piece drips with hate.

The response to the piece from commenters was mostly positive — but not because the supporters of Tent City are anti-Semitic. Most are not. Most of the commenters — as with most posts on Facebook — probably didn’t read the article and just saw that Lakewood was being taken to task. That, they reasoned, is a good thing.

Two other responses are more troubling. One would fall into the category of applauding anything that takes the “right” side — i.e., the side of the homeless. To criticize the story is to make one an apologist (it is the converse of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”). A smaller group — and I hope it’s a small group — is revelling in the stereotyping and Jew-baiting and probably could care less about the homeless.
Am I being harsh? Perhaps. But the nastiness must be met with a strong, reasoned response. As I said, I agree that the township of Lakewood has engaged in a concerted effort to push the homeless out of the woods without much concern for where they might end up. And Lakewood very likely is gaming the housing system.
But Lakewood is only part of the problem. Ocean County bears a great deal of the responsibility, as well — there is no shelter in the county and not much of a plan for dealing what is likely to be a growing problem. There also is the larger issue — an economy designed to create waste, which includes dumping a class of people it deems without value onto the streets or into the woods.
The showdown in Lakewood, ultimately, was a showdown between two groups fighting for a tiny piece of the pie, a showdown designed to create winners and losers and to sew mistrust and hatred. That the people who run Lakewood are relatively small sect of orthodox Jews creates a convenient set of scapegoats and easy targets. 
And now that the camp is near its end, the anger is spilling over. The result ultimately is that the Lakewood and Ocean County power structures can dismiss the people fighting to help the homeless as racists and anti-Semites and they can ignore the homeless who were not a part of the original deal. That deal — to provide a year of housing to anyone who was in Tent City in Spring 2013 — has resulted in housing for many of those who were in the woods and should be used as a foundation on which to build a long-term solution. That’s the goal of the NJ Coalition to End Homelessness. The goal here should not be to keep the tent encampment open, at least not for any longer than is absolutely necessary, but to create enough housing, services and jobs in the region to ensure that the 100 people who have been living or may have to live in the woods don’t have to.

I’m embedding the full Facebook thread here, so readers can judge for themselves.

Send me an e-mail.