Another steroid story

So, which big name star is going down in this investigation?

As with other drugs, if the demand is there someone will step up with a supply. Baseball need to address the demand for steroids — not just testing, but compensating players who do more than just hit homers and bringing the game back to the days when small ball was the norm and fans wanted to watch 2-1 pitching contests. If there are no benefits to be gained by taking steroids, players are likely to stop taking them.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.

Is he fighting the good fight,or the partisan fight?

U.S. Attorney Chris Christie appears to be doing a good job in rooting out corruption in the Garden State. The question is whether some of his activities — his decision to take his anticorruption message to voters in Republican districts or to be seen primarily with Republican legislators — are leaving a bad taste and raise questions about his impartiaility. This is especially true with the controversy over the Bush administration’s apparent partisan power grab in the Justice Department still raging.

Christie has a partisan background and there are rumors, which he denies, that he will be challenging Gov. Corzine in 2009 — or running for some other office. I won’t go so far as to call him a partisan hack, but the math on this does not add up.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.

Now he tells us

Former CIA director George Tenet is finally ready to spill the beans on the distorted intelligence that led us into Iraq.

But only because he’s expecting a big payday for doing so — not exactly the most altruistic of motives. Tenet has penned a tell-all book, “At the Center of the Storm,” that is expected to be published Monday by Harper Collins. The New York Times, which bought a prepublication copy, offered a summary of the book:

By turns accusatory, defensive, and modestly self-critical, it is the first detailed account by a member of the president’s inner circle of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the decision to invade Iraq and the failure to find the unconventional weapons that were a major justification for the war.

The book, the Times said, paints President George W. Bush in a positive light while also making it clear that there was little debate over going to war.

Mr. Tenet described with sarcasm watching an episode of “Meet the Press” last September in which Mr. Cheney twice referred to Mr. Tenet’s “slam dunk” remark as the basis for the decision to go to war.

“I remember watching and thinking, ‘As if you needed me to say ‘slam dunk’ to convince you to go to war with Iraq,’ ” Mr. Tenet writes.

As violence in Iraq spiraled beginning in late 2003, Mr. Tenet writes, “rather than acknowledge responsibility, the administration’s message was: Don’t blame us. George Tenet and the C.I.A. got us into this mess.”

He also

largely endorses the view of administration critics that Mr. Cheney and a handful of Pentagon officials, including Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas J. Feith, were focused on Iraq as a threat in late 2001 and 2002 even as Mr. Tenet and the C.I.A. concentrated mostly on Al Qaeda.

The revelations, of course, are late in coming and only reinforce what we already know. It also underscores the failure of the Republican Congress to engage in its oversight responsibilities.

David Corn in his Capital Games blog on The Nation Web site offers this take:

But here’s an out-of-the-box question: don’t the citizens of the United States deserve to know what happened in the run-up to the war (and to 9/11) for free? Tenet may feel–as he claims–damn lousy about the screwed-up National Intelligence Estimate that helped pave the way to war in Iraq. But he did not feel bad enough to resign–or to disclose earlier what had gone wrong. He sat on the story and now is peddling it for personal profit.

Tenet should have long ago been questioned openly by a congressional committee about all this–though no Republican committee chair would have dared–or he should have spilled all to 60 Minutes and other media, as a public service, not as an advertisement for his book. On Friday, Representative Henry Waxman, the chairman of the House oversight and government reform committee, sent Tenet a letter asking him to testify before his committee on May 10 regarding “one of the claims used to justify the war in Iraq–the assertion that Iraq sought to import uranium from Niger–and related issues.” Let’s hope Tenet can take time from the book tour to appear.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.

Debating the debates

I missed the debate — got hom late from work and, well, it just didn’t interest me. But as my last couple of posts show, I’ve been watching some of the post-debate coverge. My sense from the handful of clips I’ve seen — and the few minutes at the end that I did manage to catch — is that I didn’t miss anything.

There are three front-running candidates, with maybe Bill Richardson hangign around the endges and two longshots with aggressively antiwar views (yes, I like Dennis Kucinich best, though I am also a realist and just don’t see him going anywhere).

So it comes down to two candidates for me: Barack Obama and John Edwards. I don’t have the sense that a debate that takes place a full 10 months before I’d have a chance to vote in the primary (it’s the only reason that I, a committed independent, remain registered as a Democrat) will help me decide.

Right now, I rank my own preferences this way:

  • Kucinich — against hte war, skeptical of military engagement in general, extremely liberal on other issues
  • Edwards — the two Americas
  • Obama — he speaks of hope without pandering

It gets a little more difficult from here. I think I like Richardson and Dodd next, though I can’t pinpoint why, and I don’t like Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, though I think he is correct in his assessment that committing to a unified Iraq — a nation that was cobbled together by the British in the early part of the century when the major powers carved up the remnants of the Ottoman Empire — is almost delusional. the natural divisions are going to win out in the end, I think, though I think his suggested partition — given the mass relocations it would require can only further enflame things.

I’d rather watch Baseball Tonight and read the paper tomorrow (or tonight).

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog

E-mail me by clicking here.