Two is one too many

The Record of Hackensack attempts to keep an important issue on the table — the double-dipping of elected officials.

By double-dipping, I mean the practice of holding an elected office and an appointed one. There are dozens of elected officials around the state that engage in the practice, including Monroe Mayor Richard Pucci who also serves as executive director of the Middlesex County Improvement Authority.

In the state Legislature, there are numerous attorneys who represent local boards — or go before local boards for developers, and a handful with public jobs like state Sen. Teresa Ruiz, D-Essex, who serves as the deputy chief of staff to the Essex County executive, state Sen. Nicholas Sacco, D-Bergen, who is assistant superintendent for the North Bergen Board of Education, and Assemblyman Ronald Dancer, R-Ocean, who is an interviewer in the Ocean County adjuster’s office.

As the Record points out, in writing about a bill sponsored by state Sen. Bill Baroni, R-Mercer,
The potential conflicts of interest when a state senator or Assembly member is also a municipal engineer or attorney for one of the towns in the district are obvious to Baroni. They are also obvious to us. Such conflicts raise questions about favoritism, effectiveness and accountability. They are often a way to consolidate power and influence.

Why do some legislators understand that and some don’t?

The answer, of course, is not that some don’t understand, but that most do understand and benefit.

The editorial cites a report — “How Much Is Enough?” issued last year by New Jersey Policy Perspective — that “describes the problems created by double dipping and the state’s incestuous political culture.”

According to the report, ” … the prime motive in seeking and holding public office is to control the distribution of favors and rewards. Among the most prized favors and rewards, of course, are jobs.” It becomes accepted and even desirable to hold multiple government jobs, and some legislators see nothing wrong with it.

Not everyone sees it that way. The report cites a poll last year that found that more than three-quarters of New Jersey voters said state lawmakers should not be allowed to have another government job of any kind, elected or appointed.

But some lawmakers have trouble hearing that message. They know the public is sick and tired of corruption and wants reform. But giving up local power and influence — and more than one public paycheck — is hard.

Hard, perhaps, but necessary. One public job should be enough.

Ballot failure is victory for gay rights

I’m hopeful that this shows that the anti-gay-marriage forces are losing their power.

Organizers conceded Monday that their initiatives to repeal two Oregon gay rights laws will not make the November ballot.

The fact that the initiatives are stalled offers more evidence that opponents are losing support, say gay rights activists, who were also celebrating the legalization of same-sex marriages in California on Monday.

A brewing conflict on affordable housing:An interview with Bill Baroni

Assembly bill 500, which would eliminate the use of regional contribution agreements as a way for suburban towns to meet their affordable housing obligation, is now in the hands of the state Senate.

The bill, a first step toward reforming the state’s affordable housing program, comes at a time when most suburban communities in the state are challenging a rule proposal put forward by the state Council on Affordable Housing that would dramatically increase the housing obligation created by new warehouse construction.

A500, as I said, is a good first step, but it has its flaws — read my recent posts or our editorial.

State Sen. Bill Baroni — whose 14th District includes Cranbury, Jamesburg, Monroe, Plainsboro, South Brunswick and West Windsor among towns covered by Packet Publications — also sees flaws in the bill. In a conversation today, he told me that he was working in the Senate to address the warehousing issue, especially as it pertains to Cranbury.

The warehousing formula, as he says, is “not even close to being based on science — there is no data to support it.” Plus, he adds, the retroactive nature of the rules — which require towns to factor in development that occurred as far back at 2004 — contradicts the planning basis on which the Mount Laurel decisions were made.

“One of the goals of the Mount Laurel decisions was to have towns plan better, to make sure that they plan for affordable housing in their towns,” he said. “Retroactivity runs counter to that smart-growth approach and I have a problem with that.”

He said the final product needs to respect the “core moral responsibility of providing affordable housing,” but also respect the needs of local towns.

He said he agrees with criticism of RCAs, but he would prefer to see them phased out over time.

“I don’t think you can go cold turkey with RCAs,” he said. “Donor and receiving towns have been dependent on them for too long.”

The Legislature, he says, has a potentially larger issue to address, however, one that could create new constitutional complications — that of shrinking space. I asked him about towns that are at or close to build out but that are considered by COAH to be developing. A town like Cranbury, or even South Brunswick, is fast running out of buildable land in no small part because of municipal commitments to open-space preservation. COAH, however, has not generally factored in preserved land.

It creates a conflict that should be resolved sooner rather than later.

“How do we provide affordable housing, keeping the commitment we’ve made, but also recognize that there are economic, health and space issues that towns have already run into?” he asked. “At what point, do you say we can do no more

“At one point, you will have a clash between affordable housing and open space. If trends that are apparent now don’t change, you will have towns faced with requirements to build but the only space available would be the open space.”

The conflict does not lend itself to a simple answer.