Will Obama set a new table?

The nation’s agricultural and food policies are stuck in the past — the 19th century, to be exact — and food activists are hoping the new president will change the way the nation eats and farms, bringing the United States into the 21st century.

It remains an open question, however, whether he will.

Although Mr. Obama has proposed changes in the nation’s farm and rural policies and emphasizes the connection between diet and health, there is nothing to indicate he has a special interest in a radical makeover of the way food is grown and sold.

Still, the dream endures. To advocates who have watched scattered calls for changes in food policy gather political and popular momentum, Mr. Obama looks like their kind of president.

Not only does he seem to possess a more-sophisticated palate than some of his recent predecessors, but he will also take office in an age when organic food is mainstream, cooking competitions are among the top-rated TV shows and books calling for an overhaul in the American food system are best sellers.

“People are so interested in a massive change in food and agriculture that they are dining out on hope now. That is like the main ingredient,” said Eddie Gehman Kohan, a blogger from Los Angeles who started Obamafoodorama.com to document just about any conceivable link between Mr. Obama and food, whether it is a debate on agriculture policy or an image of Mr. Obama rendered in tiny cupcakes.

“He is the first president who might actually have eaten organic food, or at least eats out at great restaurants,” Ms. Gehman Kohan said.

Still, no one is sure just how serious Mr. Obama really is about the politics of food. So like mystery buffs studying the book jacket of “The Da Vinci Code,” interested eaters dissect every aspect of his life as it relates to the plate.

The reality, as with everything else surrounding the president-elect, is that progressives may be projecting their own desires onto him, leaving far more room for disappointment than there should be.

The LGBT movement is (rightly) angry over the choice of the Rev. Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. Economic populists — like me — are none too pleased with the economic team he’s assembled, peace activists are angry over his retention of Robert Gates as defense secretary (not to mention their puzzlement over the choice of Hillary Clinton for secretary of state), and so on.

None of this should have been a surprise — as I’ve written and so many on the left have said, Barack Obama is a cautious political centrist, albeit one with progressive instincts that have been lacking among most Democrats in recent years.

I remain hopeful that Obama will move the nation in a more humane and reformist direction, even if he does not take us as far toward social democracy as I would like.

Tenants have rights — even when landlords face foreclosure

This would seem to be common fairness — but then, there are no guarantees that landlords will be fair. So the state public advocate has to remind landlords that they can’t kick their tenants to the curb when they go into foreclosure.

As foreclosures continue to rise across New Jersey, Public Advocate Ronald K. Chen and Banking and Insurance Commissioner Steven M. Goldman said today landlords and others who force tenants out without a legal eviction order face both civil and criminal charges. Likewise, they said, lawyers and real estate agents who try to force tenants out could lose their licenses and face fines.

“We have had reports that tenants are being informed by real estate agents, attorneys, and others acting on behalf of a lender that they must move because their building has been foreclosed upon,” Chen said. “We have already reached out to several of these organizations and individuals to put them on notice that their actions are illegal.”

Of the 50,000 foreclosures anticipated in New Jersey this year, between 20,000 to 23,000 tenants are affected, said Matt Shapiro, executive director of the New Jersey Tenants Organization.

Chen and Goldman are fighting back by targeting letters from landlords, real estate firms and lawyers telling tenants they must vacate their apartments because of a foreclosure or offering “cash for keys.”

Tenants should not be intimidated. And if they feel they are being intimidated they should call the New Jersey Tenants Organization.

Money for nothing?

The numbers wouldn’t be quite so shocking — $180 million over eight years — had the Yankees not already written some big checks in recent weeks.

Mark Teixeira is reported to have signed the latest big-money deal with Hank and Hal Steinbrenner, bringing to about $425 the amount spent by the Bronx Bombers on three players this off season alone. And this doesn’t take into account the $300 million deal Alex Rodriguez signed a year ago, or the millions upon millions owed to Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera.

As ESPN points out,

Teixeira’s salary gives the Yankees, who are preparing to move into their $1.3 billion new ballpark in April, the four highest-paid players in Major League Baseball, including third baseman Alex Rodriguez, shortstop Derek Jeter and Sabathia.

Teixeira’s agreement also comes just one day after the Yankees received a $26.9 million luxury tax bill for 2008, when their streak of 13 consecutive playoff appearances ended. But with the revenue from their new stadium, where tickets are priced at up to $2,500 per game, their appetite for free agents wasn’t diminished.

It’s truly mind boggling to think how much money the franchise has tied up in a handful of players, but then these are some pretty good players.

Consider that the infield boasts four all-stars — two of whom are essentially automatic first-ballot Hall-of-Famers. They also have the games all-time greatest closer.

At the same time, this is a team with three huge questions hanging over it:

  • Starting pitching after CC Sabathia includes a pitcher coming off a major injury (Wang), a pitcher with a history of injuries and only pitching well in his walk year (Burnett) and a kid or two.
  • The outfield is either old (Matsui and Damon), coming off a career year (Nady) or just not worth much (Swisher and Cabrera).
  • Robinson Cano has shown a troubling tendency to coast.

So, we’ll see if this spending spree has the desired effect. It has been eight years since the Yankees won the World Series and five since they made it to the series. As things stand right now, I don’t know if they even can be considered the favorite to win the pennant.

But then, I’ve never been a fan of the pinstripers.

Readers discuss same-sex marriage

I thought it might be interesting to offer the responses we received to our editorial on same-sex marriage — the responses come from the South Brunswick Post and The Princeton Packet.

Stan, Dec. 18:

Same sex “marriage” violates the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God. These people know where they’re going.

Dennis C. McGrath, Dec. 18:

Yes, I do know where I’m going. To the courthouse, to be civilly married and have my full rights as a citizen restored. Whatever you imagine your god to be or to care about is of no consequence to me, and of no legal standing. Sorry, Stan.

cav, Dec. 19:

Stan is quite the closed minded bigot. He’s living back in the 1950s when it was OK to vent your hatred for gays with impunity and to beat them up without worry of any consequences. Beating a gay to a pulp was sport and fun for the hate mongers.

Notstan, Dec. 20:

Stan is obviously a time traveler from 1843, how quaint. Laws of nature? Hate to burst his bubble but homosexuality does exist in nature.Homosexual and bisexual behavior are widespread in the animal kingdom: a 1999 review by researcher Bruce Bagemihl shows that homosexual behavior, has been observed in close to 1500 species, ranging from primates to gut worms, and is well documented for 500 of them.

taylor, Dec. 21:

Like President Elect Obama, I don’t believe marriage should be made legal between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. Why am I called a bigot, but Obama is given a pass? Hmmmm, interesting double standard, to be sure. Why aren’t gay groups picketing TODAY outside his multio million dollar mansion in Chicago? What a joke.

Rob, Dec. 22:

taylor, the LGBT community is doing what it can in seeking President-Elect Obama’s support. As you may have heard here’s a busy man, and picketing outside his mansion in Chicago is not the way to reach him.Obama’s support at the moment means, on a federal level, once he is sworn into office, to fulfill his campaign promises to repeal DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act which makes it so that legal same-sex marriages recognized in MA and CT do not need to be recognized by other states, nor does the federal government need to recognize them) and DADT (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell). He has already said that repealing DADT will be a delayed action because, well, there’s the whole economy thing to deal with. You being called a bigot is unfortunate, but regardless of you being labeled as such, I am curious why you feel that marriage should not be made legal between two persons of the same gender, and invite you to either respond to my comment or to e-mail me.

I find the debate here interesting — more for the sense of victimhood being offered by the defenders of so-called “traditional marriage” than for any real discussion of the issue.

I do think it important to add — in response to taylor — that the LGBT community is protesting Obama’s choice of the Rev. Rick Warren of the author of “The Purpose Driven Life” and the conservative evangelical pastor of the Saddleback Church in Orange County, Calif., to give the invocation at the inaugural. So no, Obama is not getting a pass from the LGBT community.