I have to share this letter from the Hillsborough Beacon, which takes issue with our editorial on same-sex marriage. John Tardy writes that same-sex marriage is an oxymoron. “Marriage,” he writes has “for millennia meant the union of a male and a female human with the intent to create and raise a family, i.e., have children of their own and to nurture them into adulthood.” So, while gay and lesbian couples “can ‘borrow’ someone else’s children or family one way or another, the basic function of procreation that is at the core of a marriage is physically defunct in such situations.”
Procreation, apparently, is the key, which leaves heterosexual couples like my wife and I — who tried but couldn’t have kids and others who have adopted, or older couples who marry after they no longer can create a child — outside of this very narrow definition.
I am sure that Mr. Tardy would make an exception for my wife and me — we have what he would consider compatible equipment — and I have to say I’m honored. Of course, making such an exception knocks the foundation out from under his initial argument.
