This week’s Dispatches is on the state comptroller’s report on government agencies and lobbying firms.
Author: hankkalet
Hank Kalet is a poet and freelance journalist. He is the economic needs reporter for NJ Spotlight, teaches journalism at Rutgers University and writing at Middlesex County College and Brookdale Community College. He writes a semi-monthly column for the Progressive Populist. He is a lifelong fan of the New York Mets and New York Knicks, drinks too much coffee and attends as many Bruce Springsteen concerts as his meager finances will allow. He lives in South Brunswick with his wife Annie.
Runner’s diary, Tuesday
My legs are still sore from this morning’s run, which is a good thing, I suppose. I ran three miles in about 26 minutes (probably about 25:50) and then did crunches.
iPod: Joe Strummer, Streetcore
One-hit wonder?
Political candidacies — like tables and chairs — need more than one leg to stand upright. Chris Christie, the Republican frontrunner in the race for governor, may be about to learn this first hand.
Spring hopes eternal
Nine days until Johan Santana opens the season in Cincinnati and I find myself just perking up to the reality of it.
It's been a long offseason, thanks to collapse redux, a Phillies title and a Yankees spemding spree, but the new bullpen looks good and the starting pitching has serious potential (though it remains a question mark to some degree because of age and inconsistency).
The lineup is the issue, more specifically the back end with the anemic Brian schneider and Luis Castillo batting in front of the pitcher. I'd almost rather seem Santana and No. 5 starter Livan Hernandez hit seven.
But it is spring and in spring hope springs eternal — even for the Nationals.
And I just may have to buy this toddler Mets cap for my niece, Jocelyn (maybe they have it in pink). Have to give her the proper direction, after all.
This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service from Verizon Wireless!
To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.
Note: To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime� 6.5 or higher is required.
Obama’s Afghanistan policy: Different but still the same
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
There is not a lot to like about President Barack Obama’s newly announced Afghanistan strategy.
First, there will be more troops and advisers. So, war remains the answer in Afghanistan, even if the Obama administration is bulking up diplomatic efforts.
Second, there is the rhetoric — which Rachel Maddow last night showed was similar, sometimes word for word, to the language used by President George W. Bush.
It is true that the strategy is a break from the Bush administration’s, but it is a falsehood to say that the war in Afghanistan was not one of choice as we are hearing from some. Afghanistan may have been the home to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, but a full-out war was not necessarily something that had to follow 9/11. A narrower approach was still possible back in October 2001, one that could have resembled a police raid on a drug-manufacturing house — a coordinated effort that would not have resulted in the kind of indiscriminate actions that have poisoned our relationship with the region and now appears to imperil Pakistan.
Tom Hayden is correct:
The Obama plan instead will accelerate any plans Al Qaeda commanders have for attacking targets in the United States or Europe. The alternative for Al Qaeda is to risk complete destruction, an American objective that has not been achieved for eight years. A terrorist attack need not be planned or set in motion from a cave in Waziristan. The cadre could already be underground in Washington or London. The real alternative for President Obama should be to maintain a deterrent posture while immediately accelerating diplomacy to meet legitimate Muslim goals, from a Palestinian state to genuine progress on Kashmir.
Or as another Nation writer, editor Kristina Vanden Heuvel, said not too long ago,
Escalating the occupation will bleed us of the resources needed for economic recovery, further destabilize Pakistan, open a rift with our European allies and negate our improved image in the Muslim world prompted by our withdrawal from Iraq. Escalation will not increase US security or secure a better future for the Afghan people–indeed, more troops will certainly mean more dead civilians.
We need a much greater break with Bush policy than what President Obama is offering.
