Offering a little help, though a lot is needed

The state Legislature has approved a bill that would create a “Community Food Pantry Fund” that would distribute money to community food pantries through the state’s food purchase program. The money would be generated by a voluntary check off on state tax returns and the money would be used to be food.

It’s a decent — if only partial — solution, maintaining the current charity structure but simplifying both donation and distribution.

The legislators who sponsored the bill — Democrats Gordon Johnson, Wayne DeAngelo, Elease Evans, Albert Coutinho and Herb Conaway — said in a press release that the legislation would address hunger issues by taking advantage of New Jerseyans’ generosity.

“The global economic meltdown means hunger isn’t being limited to the poor,” said Johnson (D-Bergen). “New Jersey is a generous state, and we can and should make it easier to spread that generosity and do whatever we can to ensure no one in this state goes to bed hungry.”

“The global economic crisis is hitting our state hard and may get worse,” DeAngelo (D-Mercer) said. “People who never thought they would ever visit a food pantry are now relying on them to put food on the table for their families. These are tough times, and anything we can do to make it easier for people to help those less fortunate is a good thing.”

I’m glad to see the legislation pass — and I expect the governor to sign it shortly — but as I said, this is just a half measure. State and federal governments — which are the people’s representatives, an extension of the citizenry — have a responsibility to take care of those who get battered by our poorly structured economy, which is set up to favor people with money and tosses aside those deemed expendable.

As I wrote last week,

The cyclical nature of our economy in which the booms are inevitably followed by busts leaves each of us vulnerable. It has become a cliché that most of us are one misfortune — a lost job, a health-care crisis, a divorce — away from a visit to the soup kitchen.

This leaves private charitable organizations vulnerable, as well. When the money dries up donors tend not to contribute, leaving the mostly private agencies that act as our de facto safety net with less money and food to distribute at a time when more money and food is being requested.

It is the reason why government programs like Social Security and welfare, unemployment and disability insurance, food stamps and school lunch programs, Medicare and Medicaid and the other New Deal and Great Society programs we have come to rely on were created.

We dismantled much of it over the last 30 years, stigmatizing the poor and others in need and leaving it to the private, underfunded and understaffed agencies to take care of what is a very public problem.

The thing to do, if we hadn’t gutted our ability to generate revenue, if we had not made taxes a bad word and turned government into a pejorative, would be to rebuild what we’ve deconstructed, to fix what we’ve broken. Government has its uses and one of its most important is to protect its citizens, and not just from crime of a terrorist attack, but from corporate greed and the vicissitudes of the irrational marketplace.

Doggie diaries: The story of Rosie and Sophie Sunning on a lazy summer day

Puppies certainly know how to take in the sun om a summer's day. I think this is what they mean by the dog's life.

This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service from Verizon Wireless!

To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.

Note: To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime� 6.5 or higher is required.

Friday five: Cleaning house at Citifield

This week's five focuses on my beloved Metropolitans and their dismal effort so far this season. I figure there are at least five players on the roster who should dispatched to the scrap heap.

Here are my choices:

1. Fernando Tatis — the Mets got all they were going toget out of this retread, who has turned into a doubleplay machine.

2. Luis Castillo — A slap hitter with no power, a former Gold Glover who is terrible in the field, a terrible signing that kept them from going after Orlando Hudson.

3. Brian Schneider — A veteran with absolutely nothing to offer.

4. Tim Redding — I was once told that, if I had nothing good to say I should say nothing. I have nothing to say.

5. Livan Hernandez — It was a nice run that came to its inevitable and disastrous conclusion

Let's go, Mets!

———-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless LGVX9900 device.

We’re already paying for health care

The debate over healthcare reform is on the wrong track. Rather than working to craft a logical system that provides adequate care to all, we are worried about how we’re going to pay for it. That’s one reason that Congress (aside from a few members) has taken a single-payer system off the table.

Today’s New York Times outlines the problem — though, it doesn’t portray it as a problem, but as an inevitable outcome of the debate. The problem with this, however, as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) pointed out recently on Air America’s “Ring of Fire” radio program, is that it assumes that new money needs to be raised to cover Americans.

The reality, as Sanders said, is that there is plenty of money in the current system. We pay it now in insurance premiums and copays and other out-of-pocket expenses. A single-payer system would just redirect the money from the inefficient for-profit system now in place to a government-sponsored non-profit system.

The money is there already. I think what we’re dealing with here again is this mythology that people love, you know, everybody tells me, “Bernie, I just love paying 12, 13 thousand dollars a year to a private health insurance company for my family’s health insurance. I just get a great joy writing out that check to Blue Cross Blue Shield or Connecticut General. That just makes me feel great, but I hate to pay taxes.”

So what our Republican friends say is that your taxes are going to go up under a single-payer. True. They will. What they are forgetting? They’re forgetting that you’re not going to pay for private health insurance. They are forgetting that your employer is not going to have to pay a significant amount of money that should be reinvested in their business needs into health care.

They are forgetting that General Motors right now puts more money into health care per car than you do into steel.

So the answer is that health care is going to cost money. Under a single-payer, it is publicly funded, but you’re not going to have to pay private health insurance. And at the end of the day, that is a much more cost-effective way of delivery quality, comprehensive care.

That, of course, should be the goal — not just plugging the holes in the current system and driving down cost, but providing every American with affordable health care.

Too bad the big money flowing from the corporate sector is against it.

One paragraph sums up Mets’ season

This has not been the season Mets’ fans were hoping for, with six of their most important pieces spending significant time on the DL, plus a host of others joining them for various periods. But injuries are part of the game.

What has been so disturbing has been the lack of baseball IQ exhibited by this team. I can accept physical errors, but the mix of mental mistakes and terrible managerial moves makes this team look like the Washington Nationals or the Pittsburgh Pirates, rather than a legitimate contender for a division title.

Outfielders turn the wrong way on fly balls, turning easy plays into adventures. Luis Castillo drops an easy pop-up against the Yankees costing a game. There have been more missed cut-offs, throws to wrong bases, baserunning blunders and lost at-bats this year than any team that calls itself a contender should be allowed to make.

This paragraph from today’s Mets Notes, in The New York Post, is a good example of what has helped drive this season off the rails. It focuses on veteran catcher Brian Schneider:

Manuel said he chided catcher Brian Schneider for not helping Sheffield on Wednesday when Sheffield barely scored while standing up in the third inning.

Schneider was in the on-deck circle, and it’s customary for that player to stand near the plate and direct his incoming teammate. Schneider was nowhere to be found, prompting a postgame talk from Manuel.

And there you have it. A 10-year, 32-year-old veteran who allegedly is on the roster for his glove and baseball IQ (it’s certainly not his bat) breaks one of those rules you learn in Little League. It may seem small, but it is typical of the way this team has sleepwalked through this season.