Sometimes they are angels, but usually only when they're sleeping.
This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service from Verizon Wireless!
To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.
Note: To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime� 6.5 or higher is required.
David Sirota sums up this news in a tweet:
This is EXTREMELY bad news for the already-dying world of serious journalism
Yes, Bill Moyers is retiring, meaning the Journal will end — at the same time that Now, the show he created and that David Brancaccio stewarded so well is being cancelled. Maybe it’s time to get rid of the television.
The Federal Reserve, as William Greider has written, thrives on secrecy, making it the perfect tool for the banking and finance industry to gin up profits. Whatever its earliest mission, it now functions as nothing more than the bankers’ private government support system.
The veil, however, could be lifted if legislation that has garnered wide, bipartisan support can get through Congress with enough support — both from members of the two houses and from the public at large — to force the president to sign it.
The legislation, as described by Ryan Grim on The Huffington Post, is pretty straightforward.
The measure, cosponsored by Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), authorizes the Government Accountability Office to conduct a wide-ranging audit of the Fed’s opaque deals with foreign central banks and major U.S. financial institutions. The Fed has never had a real audit in its history and little is known of what it does with the trillions of dollars at its disposal.
Critics of the bill say it will compromise the Fed’s independence, opening it up to political manipulation. The problem with the argument, however, is that the Fed already is subject to political influence — but from the banking industry, without any say from the government or the people it is supposed to represent.
That was the gist of a letter from a coalition of labor, left-leaning economists and other progressives seeking to democratize the Web, as reported by The Huffington Post earlier in the week.
The letter notes that during the financial crisis of the past two years, the Fed’s role has shifted from simply setting monetary policy via interest rates to rapidly acquiring “a wide variety of private assets and extend[ing] massive secret bailouts to major financial institutions.”
Among those bailouts, critics argue, was the Fed’s funneling of cash to AIG counterparties. Earlier this week, a government watchdog issued a blistering report that blamed the Federal Reserve for withholding details of its massive rescue of AIG last fall. In particular, the report blamed the Federal Reserve for paying for botching its private negotiations regarding the price AIG’s rapidly souring derivatives investments, a secret move that cost taxpayers at least $13 billion.
The issue has created what to Washington’s eyes might seem like strange bed fellows — libertarian rightwinger Ron Paul and lefties like Alan Grayson and Dennis Kucinich — but that’s only because the Washington establishment cannot see beyond the D-R paradigm. The Fed question must be viewed from a different vantage point, one that arranges the political world along the question of economic democracy.
Paul and Grayson may have different views, ultimately, of how the economy should function, but they both are concerned about the outsized and still-growing influence of the financial industry on the economy and our democracy.
This legislation is not perfect, either, but it is necessary. The fact that people like Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers oppose it should be enough to make us realize just how much.
I don’t know about anyone else, but I’ve had just about enough of the former governor of Alaska. With her memoir on the bookstands, she’s been a painful and constant presence on the tube — hitting Oprah and the morning shows and generally sucking all the wind out of the political sails.
It has nothing to do with her political career — she is what she is, a staunch tea-bag conservative, an anti-intellectual and potentially popular enough to steal the GOP nomination for president in two-and-a-half years. But her star power is limited to that very narrow realm.
And yet, we are being made to pay attention, mostly because the political media on both sides of the ideological divide have lost their grip on politics and have turned coverage of Washington into the same kind of shallow celebrity-driven mush that dominates discussion of art, film and music.
Enough, I say. Palin takes the top spot on my current list of people I just wish would go away. We must allow her — or order her — to fade back into the snow banks of Alaska, where she can hunt and snowmobile to her heart’s content. (John McCain, by the way, deserves the blame for this; anyone who might be having second thoughts about Barack Obama just needs to consider the Palin factor and the complete disregard by McCain for anything but political calculation.)
Following Palin on the list are:
Dispatches is on the bizarre logic in Washington that forces domsestic reforms to be measured against the deficit, but not military adventures.
