Author: hankkalet

I wrote this short piece in a Facebook comment in response to a post about Bill O’Reilly’s latest assault on historical accuracy — Killing the Rising Sun. My friend Mike said he’d rather read Killing O’Reilly, so I obliged.

It was foggy that night when Bill drew the bath. Tabatha was in the other room, dreading what she knew came next. She entered the steamy bathroom, saw the loofah — and her chance. As Bill turned off the spigot and removed his robe, Tabatha struck. It was lightning quick. Bill, normally so boastful, a loudmouth who few could silence, found his voice muffled, his windpipe obstructed by something malleable, but rough and soapy. It was the loofah, the damned loofah, he always knew it would be the loofah. As he lie motionless on the wet tile, Tabatha exhaled, smiled for the first time in a long time. It was over. The reign of terror was over. He would be a factor no more.

Send me an e-mail.

Nikil Saval, in The Nation, offers an intriguing look at Karl Polyani’s critique of capitalism. Among his chief arguments is one that contradicts the libertarian market orthodoxy that assumes free markets require limited government intervention. In fact, Savil points out that the opposite is true. Polyani rightly believed that markets require as much state intervention as more socialist economic forms to manage “disruptions”:

as Polanyi shows, liberals also turn to the state to ensure that the “self-regulating” market could emerge despite these disruptions. Many of the central elements of this economic system—a “competitive labor market, automatic gold standard, and international free trade”—were far from naturally occurring, and they also required a state to ensure that “self-regulation” didn’t cause too much damage. The free market could not simply come into being on its own; it had to be legislated.

The difference, ultimately, is that socialist and social democratic systems seek to limit the commodification of human needs — or at least mitigate the negative impact on humanity that commerce will inevitably create. Markets, because they incentivize profit and shareholder value above all other motivations, are not adequate to protect clean water or air, ensure that everyone has access to healthcare, or that workers have a say in their workplaces.

Environmental protection, universal education and healthcare and the minimum wage are not interventions in a naturally occurring free-market but a set of rules intended to shift power in favor of workers and the community.

Hank Kalet’s As an Alien in a Land of Promise is a book-length mediation on homelessness and American capitalism. Interspersed with Sherry Rubel’s black-and-white photos, the hybrid work of poetry and journalism tells the stories of those living in a now-defunct homeless camp in central New Jersey, asking why our economic system turns people into refuse.

Based on a year of interviews and research in the former Tent City in Lakewood, Kalet tells the stories of people like Angelo, who lost his job in the crash of 2008, and the musician Michael. Interspersed with their voices – and those of “the pastor,” are writers like Jonathan Kozol and Michael Harrington, whose earlier research informs Kalet’s work.

The poet Eliot Katz, a former advocate for the homeless in New Brunswick, calls the book an “inventive mix of objectivist-influenced, journalistic poems and moving photographs” that “brings real, often-ignored human stories, statistics, and local geographies to life.”

B.J. Ward, author of Jackleg Opera, says Kalet “works in the poetic traditions of the inspired and observant narrator in Whitman’s ‘The Sleepers’ and, with his sense of lineation, Williams’ image-emphasis.”

Kalet is a journalist, essayist and poet, whose work appears regularly in NJ Spotlight and has been published by The Progressive, In These Times, The Progressive Populist, Main Street Rag, Lips, The Journal of New Jersey Poets and elsewhere. He is the auther of Stealing Copper, Certainties and Uncertainties, and Suburban Pastoral.

The book is published by the independent Piscataway House Press.

For more, see asanalieninalandofpromise.wordpress.com/ The book can be ordered at channel-surfing.blogspot.com/p/buy-books-by-hank-kalet.html, from Piscataway House, or Amazon. For press information, contact Hank Kalet at hankkalet@gmail.com. Press kit available upon request.

Send me an e-mail.

Clemente Pacaja lights the stove as he begins preparing his daughter Keyle’s breakfast.

I have a story today at NJ Spotlight on the difficulties faced by families with “split” immigration status — families in which at least one person has legal status (as a legal resident or citizen) and one lacks legal status. They struggle with the immigration bureaucracy, and live in constant fear that their families will be split up — that a parent, a spouse, a child may be deported, or that the entire family might be forced to live in exile.

My story today leads with Clemente Pacaja, a naturalized citizen whose wife is essentially trapped in Guatemala, where she returned as part of an effort to regularize her immigration status. Essentially, the family — Clemente, his wife Zonia and their daughter Keyle — are being punished for their attempt to comply with federal law.

Current immigration law in the United States is family based — meaning it gives preference to reuniting families over most other motivations. Most immigrants, if they are to come legally, must prove family connections or have a family member petition for their entry.

Is this the best approach? I don’t know, but it is the approach we’ve been using, which makes the story of the Pacajas and others so incomprehensible to me. Unifying families has been our goal, but then we create situations in which families are fractured, even those who are otherwise law-abiding residents.

There is a larger debate to be had about immigration — I tend to believe we assume freedom of movement as a human right and that restricting it can only be defended for very specific and delineated reasons. (David Miller discusses it here, though I think some of his reasoning is incomplete). Those reasons can and should be debated and might include safety and economic concerns, on both sides — i.e., protecting the safety and economic security of the United States, but also recognizing that immigrants often are fleeing from unsafe and economically insecure nations.

Comprehensive reform has been stymied by immigration hardliners in the Republican Party, and with the election of Donald Trump we can assume that, rather than debating comprehensive reform, we will be arguing over deportations, a border wall, religious and national entry bans and so on.

In the meantime, I want to give Clemente Pacaja a chance to speak in his own words. The video is in Spanish, and a translation (done by Maria Juega of the Latin American Legal Defense and Education Fund) is provided below:

Good morning and good afternoon.
Thanks to all those people who will be watching me on the internet or on television. I am a husband who has petitioned for his wife in Guatemala. Unfortunately, there was a question she could not answer and she remains in Guatemala.

I ask God that this problem can be resolved soon. Sincerely, we are suffering; my daughter and I; I miss her and my girl misses her mother and sincerely her health is getting worse and she asks me every day “where is my mommy?”.And I hope in God that everything is resolved soon.

I want to give thanks to all the people who are helping me. Especially, Mrs. Sara Batres, and my Congresswoman Mrs. Watson-Coleman. May God bless and protect them wherever they are. And also, the journalist who interviewed me, I wish them all the best.

I hope that my story is heard by people who have a similar case to my wife’s so we can be in contact with one another and figure out what we can do with the immigration officers in Guatemala, who are coming down hard, by questioning people who are led to believe that all they are going down for is to get their visas legally and come right back. But it actually does not happen like this. So now you have to think twice whether to trust that your loved ones can rely on the waiver that supposedly they were given, so I am really asking that if there are other Guatemalans with similar cases let’s get in touch with one another and raise our voices so that this doesn’t keep happening. And I am very sincerely grateful and may God help you and protect you.