Division Street, Part 1

The New York Times calls the president out for bad policies and divisive behavior.

It’s not the least bit surprising or objectionable that Mr. Bush would hit the trail hard at this point, trying to salvage his party’s control of Congress and, by extension, his last two years in office. And we’re not naïve enough to believe that either party has been running a positive campaign that focuses on the issues.

But when candidates for lower office make their opponents out to be friends of Osama bin Laden, or try to turn a minor gaffe into a near felony, that’s just depressing. When the president of the United States gleefully bathes in the muck to divide Americans into those who love their country and those who don’t, it is destructive to the fabric of the nation he is supposed to be leading.

But then, his actions, especially around election time, always leave me asking whether he is really all that concerned about leading or whether his primary goal is the utter destruction of his opponents and the permanent imposition of one-party rule in Washington.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

Ugly win is still a win

I fell asleep before the end of the game last night, a game improbably won by the Knicks after blowing a 19-point, fourth-quarter lead. Ugh.

I was at work pretty late and tuned the radio to the game when I got in the car to head home. It was on ESPN radio, 1050 AM, which doesn’t come in very well around hererned the game on the radio. I thought I heard that the team was up pretty big, which was a shock given that Memphis is a borderline playoff team and the game was in Tennessee.

I tried listening, but the static was too bad. I tuned into Y-Rock on WXPN instead and heard this edgy, straight-up rock song called “All Better Now” from a band called Earl Greyhound and didn’t know until I got inside and turned on the tube that the Knocks (a deliberate misspelling) had dithered away 11 points.

From that point, it got truly ugly with both sides finding it difficult to drop the ball in the bucket and the Knocks somehow finding just enough inside to outlast the Grizzlies.

That fortitude, if you will, allows me to look on the game with some optimism, though this remains a badluy constructed team. Expect too many nights like this as the season wears on.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick

Kean Jr.: A false moderate

Many of the state’s Gannett papers — the mammoth Asbury Park Press included (Courier-News has yet to endorse but has said it would be endorsing against Bush in most cases) — have cast their lot with state Sen. Tom Kean Jr. in their endorsements in the U.S. Senate race, telling their readers that he represents the best hope for political and ethical reform in Washington. Sen. Kean’s moderate views, the papers say, are in line with the beliefs of most Jerseyans and his unwillingness to back withdrawal from Iraq is the prudent approach.

I’d laugh if the election wasn’t so close.

The key thing to remember — and something the Gannett papers ignore — is that Sen. Kean, no matter how independent he claims to be, will caucus with the GOP. And if his election results in the Republicans retaining control over the Senate it will mean that the same kind of troglodytes who now control the major Senate committees will still run them. This means, for instance, that no matter how green Sen. Kean says he is, positive environmental legislation has no chance of getting through the Senate.

Don’t believe me, read this post from Steven Hart detailing the right-wing assault about to happen over the next week. This assault (detailed in The Star-Ledger), which is designed to defeat the Democratic incumbent, only adds more ammunition to my argument.

The thing that I find so unseemly about this — and it is, admittedly, a staple of politics in the 21st Century — is that Sen. Kean apparently disagrees with some of the material that has gone out and, including some beliefs attributed to him by the conservative groups:

National Right to Life, an anti-abortion group, has pumped more than $78,000 into campaign mailers and radio ads supporting Kean against U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez, a Democrat, in a close race that could help determine whether Republicans keep control of the Senate.

The group’s post card has a picture of an infant on the front and says, “Please vote Nov. 7, but not for Bob Menendez. Here’s why …” The flip side says “compare the candidates and their positions.” There are three check boxes labeled “partial birth abortion,” “parental notification” and “judicial nominees.” All of the boxes in the Kean column are checked.

The tag-line: “Your vote can make a difference for life.”

Jill Hazelbaker, Kean’s campaign spokeswoman, said yesterday the campaign has no control over independent spending by the anti-abortion group.

She said Kean does not share all the positions held by National Right to Life, but added, “Are we glad they’re here? Happy they are here? Sure.”

That last bit raises the hair on the back of my neck — talk about ethically challenged — and should end any discussion about how Sen. Kean is the squeaky-clean reformer in this race. He has proven, throughout this campaign, that he has been willing to do almost anything to win — which leaves him swimming in the same deceitful sludge in which he has accused Sen. Bob Menendez of swimming.

I’ve written before about how I view Sen. Menendez as a flawed candidate, but Sen. Kean brings far more baggage along with him in the form of folks like Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, and it is too important at this moment in history for voters to end Republican control over the Senate not to vote for the incumbent Democrat.

South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick