‘Oppenheimer’ and the Gaza Rationale
A headline in The New York Times caught my attention last week: “Blaming Hamas for Gazans’ Suffering, Many Israelis Feel Little Sympathy.” I had just watched Oppenheimer, the 2023 surprise blockbuster about the creation of the atomic bomb, and felt a sense of deja vu.
Share
The Israelis in the story lacked sympathy for Palestinian civilians. In fact, most dismissed the idea of “innocent civilians” altogether. They “blame(d) Hamas for starting the war and for embedding its fighters among the Gazan population, operating, according to the military, out of schools, hospitals and mosques, and in tunnels beneath Gazans’ homes."
I could hear echoes of Cillian Murphy’s Oppenhiemer trying to convince his fellow scientists to join the Manhattan Project, which was seeking to create an atomic weapon, an American bomb that would kill guilty and innocent alike. The Nazis will use it, he says, so we have to use it first — a rationale that was updated to allow for the incineration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Upgrade to paid
Syndication and Reuse
Books by Hank Kalet
We like to pretend that historical films are about the times they portray. This is true to a limited extent, however. All art (and scholarship, I would argue) is about multiple time periods — but especially about the time in which it is made.
Share Channel Surfing

Unlock this post for free, courtesy of Hank Kalet.
 |
|
Claim my free post |
Or upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid
A subscription gets you:
 |
Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
 |
Post comments and join the community |
 |
Get a copy of As An Alien in a Land of Promise. |
© 2024 Hank Kalet
Email me for address.
Unsubscribe
 
|