Sen. Edward Kennedy, in many ways the most talented and influential of a talented and influential band of brothers, succumbed early this morning to the brain cancer that has kept him away from the institution he had been a member of for 47 years.
Kennedy, for many, was a caricature — the disoriented drunk of the Clarence Thomas hearings, the protection of privilege that was at the center of the William Kennedy Smith trial, his womanizing, Chappaquidick — and there is truth in the image.
But Kennedy’s legacy is his commitment to a kind of liberalism that had fallen out of fashion as the ’70s wore on and moved into the ugly, Reaganite 1980s. It was a commitment to universal health coverage, to education for all, to diplomacy and peace.
For decades, Kennedy was at the center of the most important issues facing the nation, and he did much to help shape them. A defender of the poor and politically disadvantaged, he set the standard for his party on health care, education, civil rights, campaign-finance reform and labor law. He also came to oppose the war in Vietnam and, from the beginning, was an outspoken opponent of the war in Iraq.
Congressional scholar Thomas E. Mann, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, described Kennedy’s mark on the Senate as “an amazing and endurable presence. You want to go back to the 19th century to find parallels, but you won’t find parallels. It was the completeness of his involvement in the work of the Senate that explains his career.”
The Post said the “list of major laws bearing his imprint … fills pages.”
In 1965, he led the successful Senate floor battle that passed what was popularly known as the Hart-Celler Act, landmark legislation that abolished immigration quotas and lifted a 1924 ban on immigration from Asia.
“This bill really goes to the very central ideals of our country,” Kennedy said on the floor of the Senate. The legislation, the most significant immigration reform in four decades, passed both the House and Senate by overwhelming margins.
He was long the Senate’s leading voice on civil rights, including the 1982 Voting Rights Act extension, as well as efforts to advance the concept of equality to include the disabled and women in the workplace.
In 1972, he was a key supporter of Title IX, an amendment requiring colleges and universities to provide equal funding for men’s and women’s athletics. As a member of the Judiciary Committee, he played an important though indirect role in the 1973 investigation of the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard M. Nixon’s resignation. In 1996 and again in 2007, he was the lead Senate sponsor of legislation increasing the minimum wage.
In the 1980s, when a Republican president and Senate mounted a major campaign to roll back programs he had championed, he led the fight to save them. Even in the minority, he worked to expand government’s role in providing health care to children, making loans available to college students and extending civil rights to the disabled, among many other embattled initiatives.
He voted against both Iraq wars and challenged the growing militarism.
Health care, however, will be his legacy. While universal health insurance has yet to become a reality, it is because of Kennedy that we are still talking about national health care and are likely to see it come to fruition.
Long before he fell ill, Kennedy made health care a major focus of his career, terming it “the cause of my life.” His legislation resulted in access to health care for millions of people and funded cures for diseases that afflicted people around the world. He was a longtime advocate for universal health care and was instrumental in promoting biomedical research, as well as AIDS research and treatment. He was a leader in the passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and the 1996 Kennedy-Kassebaum Bill — with senator Nancy Kassebaum (R-Kan.) — which allowed employees to keep health insurance after leaving their job.
Health care reform is “a defining issue for our society,” Kennedy told fellow senators during a 1994 debate. “Do we really care about our fellow citizens?” It was a question he asked countless times, in one form or another, during his long Senate career. He faced opposition from most Republicans — and more than a few Democrats — who insisted that Kennedy’s proposals for universal health care amounted to socialized medicine that would lead to bureaucratic sclerosis and budget-breaking costs and inefficiencies.
Receiving a diagnosis in May 2008 of a brain tumor, Kennedy rose from his hospital bed that summer and cast a dramatic vote on the Senate floor in favor of legislation preventing sharp cuts in Medicare payments to doctors. Several Republicans were so moved by his presence that they switched their earlier votes on the bill, giving it a veto-proof majority.
It must have pained him to see the inertia that has stricken the Senate — and the obstructionist ways of an opposition party unwilling to work across the aisle to move anything forward.
Perhaps this is not the day to say it. So let me start by saying that for the second half of his career, he was immensely valuable and I will miss his influence on the country.But the liberalism that you speak of, that was going out of favor in the 1970s, that I still subscribe to, went out of favor in large part because until that one speech at the 1980 convention, its leading proponent was completely unable to articulate it as a coherent philosophy, with a morally driven agenda. The Reaganites squawked that liberalism was nothing but a collection of interest groups doing special pleading, and that view was confirmed every time during the media went to Kennedy for the liberal point of view on an issue. He always spoke of how much some measure would help some segment of the population, and never why helping them was part of a broader system that was fair to everyone and helped the country grow.It is not Kennedy's fault alone that the within-the-system left emerged with no viable spokesman in the years following McGovern's about-face on Cambodia, Humphrey's death, etc. But that the role fell to the ambitious and at the time woefully inadequate Kennedy is a large part of how Reaganism became the accepted political orthodoxy for a generation.
…like we’ve all been saying, it’s not a good proposition. Look at Canada and all other countries that have this type of health reform…it’s not beneficial to folks who truly need good and quick health attention.
Sorry, but \”Teddie\” is not a \”lion\”. He left Mary Jo to die a horrible death so he could sober up. Anyone else would have been in prison for a spell. And not a vacation spot. That was very close to murder!Further, as a \”Catholic\” politician, he gave public scandal with his support of abortion. The Church was cowed by the Kennedy fortune, but he should have been called to account. We can chat about why the CINO \”Catholic In Name Only\” politicians are allowed to pretend that they are \”in communion\” with the Catholic Church. (The Church is usually very silent about transgressions. We are all sinners. Unless the person is overt about it. Hence the private meeting between Nancy Pelosi and her bishop. After that meeting there was a two line release from the diocese about it. Ms. Pelosi put her own spin on it.)No, I'm not a Ted Kennedy fan. And really feel \”The lion sleeps tonight\” really maligns Lions everywhere!