Exploding a healthcare myth 1

Opponents of healthcare reform like to pretend that the system we have right now is full of choice, that we can get in to see doctors whenever we want, that we have access to every and any treatment under the sun.

Patients, however, know better.

David Leonhardt, in The New York Times, pretty much explodes the open-access myth in this important analysis story. Rationing, he says, exists in a big way — in “three main ways”:

The first is the most counterintuitive, because it doesn’t involve denying medical care. It involves denying just about everything else.

The rapid rise in medical costs has put many employers in a tough spot. They have had to pay much higher insurance premiums, which have increased their labor costs. To make up for these increases, many have given meager pay raises.

This tradeoff is often explicit during contract negotiations between a company and a labor union. For nonunionized workers, the tradeoff tends to be invisible. It happens behind closed doors in the human resources department. But it still happens.

He continues:

The second kind of rationing involves the uninsured. The high cost of care means that some employers can’t afford to offer health insurance and still pay a competitive wage. Those high costs mean that individuals can’t buy insurance on their own.

The uninsured still receive some health care, obviously. But they get less care, and worse care, than they need. The Institute of Medicine has estimated that 18,000 people died in 2000 because they lacked insurance. By 2006, the number had risen to 22,000, according to the Urban Institute.

The final form of rationing is the one I described near the beginning of this column: the failure to provide certain types of care, even to people with health insurance. Doctors are generally not paid to do the blocking and tackling of medicine: collaboration, probing conversations with patients, small steps that avoid medical errors. Many doctors still do such things, out of professional pride. But the full medical system doesn’t do nearly enough.

That’s rationing — and it has real consequences.

So, please, enough about the long lines and rationed care elsewhere. That is the reality we face right here in America right now.

Unknown's avatar

Author: hankkalet

Hank Kalet is a poet and freelance journalist. He is the economic needs reporter for NJ Spotlight, teaches journalism at Rutgers University and writing at Middlesex County College and Brookdale Community College. He writes a semi-monthly column for the Progressive Populist. He is a lifelong fan of the New York Mets and New York Knicks, drinks too much coffee and attends as many Bruce Springsteen concerts as his meager finances will allow. He lives in South Brunswick with his wife Annie.

One thought on “Exploding a healthcare myth 1”

  1. Another myth: Large numbers of Canadians are coming to the US for health care. A recent study by the University of Michigan and the University of British Columbia proves that the number of Canadians coming to the US for health care is negligible and insignificant. Why would the Canadians come to the US for health care? They would go broke from the high US health care expenses.But about a million Californians a year cross the border to Mexico for cheaper health care and cheaper drugs.

Leave a comment