When exactly did the 100-day mark become such a touchstone for a presidency? Am I right in not remembering the media — newspapers, TV, cable — making this kind of fuss at the 100-day mark of the Clinton of Bush presidencies?
A presidential term is four years long — 1,461 days — and judging a presidency on its first 100 seems absurd. I know that Franklin Roosevelt managed quite a bit in his first 100; John Kennedy’s first 100 were botched. Barack Obama seems to be doing fairly well, even if he is far more of a centrist than many of his supporters realized.
The issue is not where we stand on April 29 — that has more to do with the media’s Roosevelt fetish and its “new FDR” narrative — but where we go between now and the first Tuesday in November 2012. That’s when the Obama presidency can really be judged.