At what point does MSNBC realize that Pat Buchanan adds nothing to its political coverage and that, if they want a conservative that adds to the debate, they probably should bring in David Brooks or someone with a more intellectual approach to the discussion?
Author: hankkalet
Hank Kalet is a poet and freelance journalist. He is the economic needs reporter for NJ Spotlight, teaches journalism at Rutgers University and writing at Middlesex County College and Brookdale Community College. He writes a semi-monthly column for the Progressive Populist. He is a lifelong fan of the New York Mets and New York Knicks, drinks too much coffee and attends as many Bruce Springsteen concerts as his meager finances will allow. He lives in South Brunswick with his wife Annie.
View all posts by hankkalet
Hank Kalet 
Yea buchanan is a bum.Bojackson82@gmail.com
For all Pat\’s flaws, he\’s a big gooferment republican, he is an intellectual with a several good books nailing the establishment. He\’s a nativist, who doesn\’t understand American\’s power is the diverse populace chasing the Almighty dollar. MSNBC can do whatever they want. They have virtually no draw.
Pat Buchanan was a guest on the racist, white supremacist radio show, The Political Cesspool Radio Program. Why the heck would Buchanan, a nationally known conservative pundit, be a guest on some rinky dink regional radio show that appeals to bigots? This program is on a radio station with a very weak signal but it does stream its audio on the Internet. One host of the show, James Edwards, is a big fan of David Duke and hangs on his every word. Yecccch!