My opposition to the stem cell referendum was purely based on money. The state is not in the position to borrow more cash. If it can find a way to finance the research, I’m ready to back a plan.
That’s why protests like this are so disheartening — they make it seem as though voter rejection was about something other than the money.
About 25 activists from New Jersey Right to Life and Lonegan’s group gathered at the construction site of the Stem Cell Institute of New Jersey in New Brunswick, the centerpiece project of a state program to to establish a world-class effort in stem cells.
Protesters said they want to stop the legislature from spending $270 million already approved for construction projects for stem cell research facilities. Last Tuesday, New Jersey voters rejected a $450 million bond issue to fund the research.
Lonegan characterized the effort as “high-risk, highly speculative embryonic stem cell research that we all know is destined to produce virtually nothing in terms of cures.” As for the idea that such an investment could lead to the creation of a vibrant cell culture economy in the state, he dismissed that as a “phony promise.”
Marie Tasy, director of New Jersey Right to Life, said the state’s stem cell program has been ill-conceived from the beginning. “I think the voters have clearly spoken,” she said.
They have, but only about the money. Let’s not pretend this vote was about anything else.
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
E-mail me by clicking here.
Hank Kalet 