I am going to run, verbatim, an e-mail from a friend and my response, because I think they sum up both of our reactions to the Libby verdict and subsequent hand-wringing and spin. Bill e-mailed me Friday, but I was away for a few days (which is why I haven’t posted anything since Thursday). My response is from today.
Bill writes:
So when did I become a Law and Order Republican ??????
OK, so I know that I’m one of those few people that live in the ‘fact based world’, but where does Krauthammer, Novak, etc live ????? I mean, not even to try to make a bigger meaning out of the Libby trial, but to boil it down to its simplicities. During an FBI investigation, and testimony before a grand jury, and it appears that he lied, so he was charged with lying and obstruction of justice. There was a trial, and people deliberated for a long time, and they decided that he didn’t ‘mis-remember’ or forgot, he lied with a specific purpose. Now you have pundits and Washington-insider reporters (if you can call them that) trying to spin this into something that it’s not. I think Fitzgerald put it best in his closing in saying that Libby’s lying is important because it did not allow the criminal justice proceeding to proceed. Yes, Libby’s lying doesn’t directly go to the reason for the original point of the investigation, but that investigation was impaired directly because of his lying. The way these pundits carry on is that this is some big miscarriage of justice, but the only thing I heard from the jurors was that they felt frustrated that Rove or Cheney wasn’t being charged, which then sends us back to Libby lying (and of course the jail sentence or threat of doesn’t have the normal effect that is does, as you now have members of the media calling for a pardon).
My response:
Isn’t it interesting that the same people calling for Clinton’s head because he lied under oath over a sex act are now downplaying Libby’s lying under oath tied to an intelligence coverup? Forget the issue of degree (Clinton’s lie had nothing to do with war or the death of thousands of American soldiers). You can argue that he didn’t lie, that his memory was faulty — a stretch — but to argue that it is a miscarriage shows how completely distorted by partisan politics Washington’s institutional memory and code of ethics have become.
Here is a question: If you are Bush and Rove, do you pardon Libby now hoping that time will soften its impact? Or do you allow him to serve some jail time and pardon him after the 2008 election?
Anyone who thinks that Rove isn’t considering this knows nothing about Washington.
South Brunswick Post, The Cranbury Press
The Blog of South Brunswick
The Cranbury Press Blog
E-mail me by clicking here.
Hank Kalet 